Sunday, December 29, 2013

Guide to Appellate Pleadings

Guide to Appellate Pleadings

By:

Atty. Manuel J. Laserna Jr.
December 29, 2013



Rule 40. – Appeal from MTC to RTC.
Via Notice of Appeal – 15 days.
1.      Parties
2.    Judgment or final order or part thereof appealed from,
3.    Material dates showing the timeliness of the appeal.
4.    Grounds.

Appellant’s Memorandum – 15 days. Non-filing is ground to dismiss the appeal.
Appellee’s Memorandum – 15 days from receipt of Appellant’s Memorandum.

Record on appeal – 30 days:
1.      Notice of appeal (see above) and
2.    Record on appeal.


RULE 41 - APPEAL FROM THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS TO THE COURT OF APPEALS.

Subject of appeal.—An appeal may be taken from a judgment or final order that completely disposes of the case, or of a particular matter therein when declared by these Rules to be appealable.

No appeal may be taken from:

(a)            An order denying a motion for new trial or reconsidera­tion;
(b)            An order denying a petition for relief or any similar motion seeking relief from judgment;
(c)                        An interlocutory order;
(d)            An order disallowing or dismissing an appeal;
(e)            An order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by consent, confession or compromise on the ground of fraud, mistake or duress, or any other ground vitiating consent.
(f)             An order of execution;
(g)            A judgment or final order for or against one or more of several parties or in separate claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party complaints, while the main case is pending, unless the court allows an appeal therefrom; and
(h)            An order dismissing an action without prejudice.
In all the above instances where the judgment or final order is not appealable, the aggrieved party may file an appropriate special civil action under Rule 65. (n)

Modes of appeal.—

(a)            Ordinary appeal.—The appeal to the Court of Appeals in cases decided by the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the court which rendered the judgment or final order appealed from and serving a copy thereof upon the adverse party. No record on appeal shall be required except in special proceedings and other cases of multiple or separate appeals where the law or these Rules so require. In such cases, the record -on appeal shall be filed and served in like manner.
(b)            Petition for review.—The appeal to the Court of Appeals in cases decided by the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction shall be by petition for review in accordance with Rule 42.
(c)            Appeal by certiorari.—In all cases where only questions of law are raised or involved, the appeal shall be to the Supreme Court by petition for review on certiorari in accordance with Rule 45. (n)


Rule 41, Appeal from RTC to CA.-

Notice of appeal.— 15 days. Pay appeal fees to RTC OCC.
1.      Parties to the appeal,
2.    Judgment or final order or part thereof appealed from,
3.    The court to which the appeal is being taken, and
4.    Material dates showing the timeliness of the appeal.

Record on appeal; form and contents thereof—
1.      Full names of all the parties to the proceedings shall be stated in the caption of the record on appeal.
2.    Judgment or final order from which the appeal is taken and,
3.    In chronological order, copies of only such pleadings, petitions, motions and all interlocutory orders as are related to the appealed judgment or final order for the proper understanding of the issue involved, together with such data as will show that the appeal was perfected on time.
4.    If an issue of fact is to be raised on appeal, the record on appeal shall include by reference all the evidence, testimonial and documentary, taken upon the issue involved.
5.     The reference shall specify the documentary evidence by the exhibit numbers or letters by which it was identified when admitted or offered at the hearing, and the testimonial evidence by the names of the corresponding witnesses.
6.    If the whole testimonial and documentary evidence in the case is to be included, a statement to that effect will be sufficient without mentioning the names of the witnesses or the numbers or letters of exhibits.
7.     Every record on appeal exceeding twenty (20) pages must contain a subject index. (6a)

Approval of record on appeal —
1.      Upon the filing of the record on appeal for approval and if no objection is filed by the appellee within five (5) days from receipt of a copy thereof, the trial court may approve it as presented or upon its own motion or at the instance of the appellee, may direct its amendment by the inclusion of any omitted matters which are deemed essential to the determination of the issue of law or fact involved in the appeal.
2.    If the trial court orders the amendment of the record, the appellant, within the time limited in the order, or such extension thereof as may be granted, or if no time is fixed by the order within ten (10) days from receipt thereof, shall redraft the record by including therein, in their proper chronological sequence, such additional matters as the court may have directed him to incorporate, and shall thereupon submit the redrafted record for approval, upon notice to the appellee, in like manner as the original draft. (7a)

Joint record on appeal.—Where both parties are appellants, they may file a joint record on appeal within the time fixed by section 3 of this Rule, or that fixed by the court.

Perfection of appeal; effect thereof—
1.      A party’s appeal by notice of appeal is deemed perfected as to him upon the filing of the notice of appeal in due time.
2.    A party’s appeal by record on appeal is deemed perfected as to him with respect to the subject matter thereof upon the approval of the record on appeal filed in due time.
3.    In appeals by notice of appeal, the court loses jurisdiction over the case upon the perfection of the appeals filed in due time and the expiration of the time to appeal of the other parties.
4.    In appeals by record on appeal, the court loses jurisdiction only over the subject matter thereof upon the approval of the records on appeal filed in due time and the expiration of the time to appeal of the other parties.
5.     In either case, prior to the transmittal of the original record or the record on appeal, the court
5.1.          may issue orders for the protection and preservation of the rights of the parties which do not involve any matter litigated by the appeal,
5.2.         approve compromises,
5.3.         permit appeals of indigent litigants,
5.4.         order execution pending appeal in accordance with section 2 of Rule 39, and
5.5.         allow withdrawal of the appeal.


RULE 42 - PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

How appeal taken; time for filing.—
1.      Verified petition for review with the Court of Appeals – 15 days,
2.    Paying at the same time to the CA clerk of court the corresponding docket and other lawful fees and costs, and
3.    Furnishing the Regional Trial Court and the adverse party with a copy of the petition.
4.    Upon proper motion and the payment of the full amount of the docket and other lawful fees and the deposit for costs before the expiration of the reglementary period, the Court of Appeals may grant an additional period of fifteen (15) days only within which to file the petition for review.
5.     No further extension shall be granted except for the most compelling reason and in no case to exceed fifteen (15) days. (n)

Form and contents of Petition For Review.—
1.      Verified petition seven (7) legible copies,
2.    With the original copy intended for the court being indicated as such by the petitioner,
3.    Full names of the parties to the case, without impleading the lower courts or judges thereof either as petitioners or respondents;
4.    Specific material dates showing that it was filed on time;
5.     Statement of the maters involved,
6.    Issues raised,
7.     Specification of errors of fact or law, or both, allegedly committed by the Regional Trial Court, and
8.    Reasons or arguments relied upon for the allowance of the appeal;
9.    Accompanied by clearly legible duplicate originals or true copies of the judgments or final orders of both lower courts, certified correct by the clerk of court of the Regional Trial Court, the requisite number of plain copies thereof and of the pleadings and other material portions of the record as would support the allegations of the petition.
10.                        Verification and Anti-Forum Shopping Certification under oath
11.   Affidavit of Service – Adverse parties. Lower Court.
12. CD of pleadings and annexes (PDF format)
13. Explanation


Action on the petition.—The Court of Appeals may require the respondent to file a comment on the petition, not a motion to dismiss, within ten (10) days from notice, or dismiss the petition if it finds the same to be patently without merit, prosecuted manifestly for delay, or that the questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to require consideration. (n)

Contents of comment.— seven (7) legible copies,
1.      Accompanied by certified true copies of such material portions of the record referred to therein together with other supporting papers and
2.    State whether or not he accepts the statement of matters involved in the petition;
3.    Point out such insufficiencies or inaccuracies as he believes exist in petitioner’s statement of matters involved but without repetition; and
4.    State the reasons why the petition should not be given due course.
5.     A copy thereof shall be served on the petitioner.
6.    Affidavit of Service.
7.     CD of pleading and annexes (PDF format).
8.    Explanation.
9.    Verification and AFS Certif optional/not mandatory.

Due course.—If the Court of Appeals finds prima facie that the lower court has committed an error of fact or law that will warrant a reversal or modification of the appealed decision, it may accordingly give due course to the petition.

Elevation of record.—Whenever the Court of Appeals deems it necessary, it may order the clerk of court of the Regional Trial Court to elevate the original record of the case including the oral and documentary evidence within fifteen (15) days from notice.(n)

Perfection of appeal; effect thereof —
(a)            Upon the timely filing of a petition for review and the payment of the corresponding docket and other lawful fees, the appeal is deemed perfected as to the petitioner.
The Regional Trial Court loses jurisdiction over the case upon the perfection of the appeals filed in due time and the expiration of the time to appeal of the other parties.
However, before the Court of Appeals gives due course to the petition, the Regional Trial Court may issue orders for the protection and preservation of the rights of the parties which do not involve any matter litigated by the appeal, approve corn-promises, permit appeals of indigent litigants, order execution pending appeal in accordance with section 2 of Rule 39, and allow withdrawal of the appeal.
(b)            Except in civil cases decided under the Rule on Summary Procedure, the appeal shall stay the judgment or final order unless the Court of Appeals, the law, or these Rules shall provide other­wise.

Submission for decision.—
If the petition is given due course, the Court of Appeals may set the case
1.      For oral argument
2.    Or require the parties to submit memoranda within a period of fifteen (15) days from notice.


RULE 43 - APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS AND QUASI-JUDICIAL AGENCIES TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Scope.— Rule 43 applies to appeals from judgments or final orders of the:
1.      Court of Tax Appeals and
2.    Any quasi-judicial agency in the exercise of its quasi-judicial functions.
2.1.          Civil Service Commission,
2.2.        Central Board of Assessment Appeals,
2.3.        Securities and Exchange Commission,
2.4.        Office of the President,
2.5.         Land Registration Authority,
2.6.        Social Security Commission,
2.7.         Civil Aeronautics Board,
2.8.        Bureau of Patents, Trademarks and Technology Transfer,
2.9.        National Electrification Administration,
2.10.    Energy Regulatory Board,
2.11.      National Telecommunications Commission,
2.12.    Department of Agrarian Reform under Republic Act No. 6657,
2.13.    Government Service Insurance System,
2.14.    Employees Compensation Commission,
2.15.     Agricultural Inventions Board,
2.16.    Insurance Commission,
2.17.     Philippine Atomic Energy Commission,
2.18.    Board of Investments,
2.19.    Construction Industry Arbitration Commission, and
2.20.  Voluntary arbitrators authorized by law.

Cases not covered.— Rule 43 does not apply to judgments or final orders issued under the Labor Code of the Philippines – i.e., Labor Arbiter, NLRC En Banc/Division.

Period of appeal.— Fifteen (15) days.
1.      Only one (1) motion for reconsideration shall be allowed.
2.    Pay the appeal docket fee with the CA.
3.    Court of Appeals may grant an additional period of fifteen (15) days only within which to file the petition for review.
4.    No further extension shall be granted except for the most compelling reason and in no case to exceed fifteen (15) days.

How appeal taken..— Verified petition for review
1.      Seven (7) legible copies with the Court of Appeals,
2.    Proof of service of a copy thereof on the adverse party and on the court or agency a quo.
3.    The original copy of the petition intended for the Court of Appeals shall be indicated as such by the petitioner.
4.    Upon the filing of the petition, the petitioner shall pay to the CA clerk of court the docketing and other lawful fees and deposit for costs.
5.     Exemption from payment of docketing and other lawful fees and the deposit for costs may be granted by the Court of Appeals upon a verified motion setting forth valid grounds therefor. If denied, must pay the docket fees/deposit w/in 15 days.

Contents of the Petition.—
1.      Full names of the parties to the case, without impleading the court or agencies either as petitioners or respondents;
2.    Specific material dates showing that it was filed within the period fixed herein.
3.    Concise statement of the facts
4.    Issues involved
5.     Grounds relied upon for the review;
6.    Accompanied by a clearly legible duplicate original or a certified true copy of the award, judgment, final order or resolution appealed from,
7.     Certified true copies of such material portions of the record referred to therein and other supporting papers;
8.    Verification and AFS Certif.
9.    Explanation
10.                        CD of pleading and annexes (PDF format) – not yet applied as of Dec. 27, 2013.

Action on the petition.—The Court of Appeals may
1.      Require the respondent to file a comment on the petition, not a motion to dismiss, within ten (10) days from notice,
2.    Or dismiss the petition if it finds the same
2.1.          to be patently without merit,
2.2.        prosecuted manifestly for delay,
2.3.        or that the questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to require consideration.

Contents of Comment.— Seven (7) legible copies
1.      Accompanied by clearly legible certified true copies of such material portions of the record referred to therein together with other supporting papers.
2.    Point out insufficiencies or inaccuracies in petitioner’s statement of facts and issues;
3.    State the reasons why the petition should be denied or dismissed.
4.    A copy thereof shall be served on the petitioner,
5.     Affidavit of service
6.    Explanation
7.     CD of pleading/annexes – not yet mandatory as of Dec. 27, 2013.

Due course.—If the Court of Appeals finds prima facie that the court or agency concerned has committed errors of fact or law that would warrant reversal or modification of the award, judgment, final order or resolution sought to be reviewed, it may give due course to the petition; otherwise, it shall dismiss the same. 

Factual Findings. - The findings of fact of the court or agency concerned, when supported by substantial evidence, shall be binding on the Court of Appeals.

Effect of appeal—The appeal shall not stay the award, judgment, final order of resolution sought to be reviewed unless the Court of Appeals shall direct otherwise upon such terms as it may deem just.

Remedy – Integrate a motion for TRO in the petition for review.

Submission for decision.—If the petition is given due course, the Court of Appeals may set the case for oral argument or require the parties to submit memoranda within a period of fifteen (15) days from notice.


PROCEDURE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
RULE 44 - ORDINARY APPEALED CASES

Appellant’s brief.— Forty-five (45) days to file from receipt of notice from CA. Seven (7) copies.  With proof of service of two (2) copies thereof upon the appellee.

Appellee’s brief—Forty-five (45) days from receipt of the appellant’s brief. Seven (7) copies. With proof of service of two (2) copies thereof upon the appellant.

Appellant’s reply brief.—Twenty (20) days from receipt of the appellee’s brief. Answer points in the appellee’s brief not covered in his main brief of appellant.

Time of filing memoranda in special cases.—In certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto and habeas corpus cases, the parties shall file, in lieu of briefs, their respective memoranda within a non-extendible period of thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice issued by the clerk that all the evidence, oral and documentary, is already attached to the record.

Failure of the appellant to file his memorandum within the period therefor may be a ground for dismissal of the appeal.

Extension of time for filing briefs.—Extension of time for the filing of briefs will not be allowed, except for good and sufficient cause, and only if the motion for extension is filed before the expiration of the time sought to be extended.

Contents of appellant’s brief.— In the order herein indicated:

(a)                              A subject index of the matter in the brief

>with a digest of the arguments and page references, and
>table of cases alphabetically arranged, textbooks and statutes cited with references to the pages where they are cited;
(b)            Assignment of errors numbered consecutively;
(c)            “Statement of the Case” - a clear and concise statement of

>nature of the action,
>summary of the proceedings,
> appealed rulings and orders of the court,
>nature of the judgment and
>any other matters necessary to an understanding of the nature of the controversy,
>with page references to the record;

(d)            “Statement of Facts” –

>Facts admitted by both parties
> Facts in controversy,
> With the substance of the proof relating thereto
> With page references to the record;

(e)            Statement of the issues of fact or law
(f)             “Argument” –

>Appellant’s arguments on each assignment of error
> With page references to the record. 
> The authorities relied upon shall be cited by the page of the report at which the case begins and the page of the report on which the citation is found:

(g)            “Relief” - a specification of the order or judgment which the appellant seeks; and
(h)            Appellant’s brief shall contain, as an appendix, a copy of the judgment or final order appealed from.

Contents of appellee’s brief.— In the order herein indicated, the following:

(a)            Subject Index
(b)            “Statement of Facts” - Appellee shall state that he accepts the statement of facts in the appellant’s brief, or under the heading “Counter-Statement of Facts,” he shall point out such insufficiencies or inaccuracies as he believes exist in the appellant’s statement of facts with references to the pages of the record in support thereof, but without repetition of matters in the appellant’s statement of facts; and
(c)            “Argument” - the appellee shall set forth his arguments in the case on each assignment of error with page references to the record.
> The authorities relied on shall be cited by the page of the report at which the case begins and the page of the report on which the citation is found.

Questions that may be raised on appeal.- Appellant may include in his assignment of errors any question of law or fact that has been raised in the court below and which is within the issues framed by the parties.
Ø Note - He cannot raise a new issue for the first time on appeal.

RULE 45 - APPEAL BY CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT

Verified petition with Supreme Court.— Appeal by certiorari from a judgment or final order or resolution of

1.      Court of Appeals,
2.    the Sandiganbayan,
3.    Regional Trial Court
4.    or other courts whenever authorized by law

>Verified – jurat must cite govt-issued ID
> AFS Certif. – jurat must cite govt-issued ID
> Raise only questions of law
> Explanation
> Affid. of Service – jurat must cite govt-issued ID
> CD of pleading and annexes (PDF format). May be emailed to SC.
> IBP #, MCLE #, PTR #/date, IBP Chapter, Attys. Roll No.


Time for filing; extension.—The petition shall be filed within fifteen (15) days from notice of the judgment or final order or resolution appealed from, or of the denial of the petitioner’s motion for new trial or reconsideration filed in due time after notice of the judgment. 

On motion duly filed and served, with full payment of the docket and other lawful fees and the deposit for costs before the expiration of the reglementary period, the Supreme Court may for justifiable reasons grant an extension of thirty (30) days only within which to file the petition.

Contents of petition—Eighteen (18) copies. Original copy intended for the court being indicated as such by the petitioner.

1.      Full name of the appealing party as the petitioner and the adverse party as respondent, without impleading the lower courts or judges thereof either as petitioners or respondents;
2.    Material dates showing when notice of the judgment or final order or resolution subject thereof was received, when a motion for new trial or reconsideration, if any, was filed and when notice of the denial thereof was received;
3.    Statement of the matters involved,
4.    Reasons or Arguments relied on for the allowance of the petition;
5.     Accompanied by:

>a clearly legible duplicate original, or a certified true copy of the judgment or final order or resolution certified by the clerk of court of the court a quo and the requisite number of plain copies thereof,
> and such material portions of the record as would support the petition;

6.    Verification and AFS certification

Dismissal or denial of petition by MINUTE RESOLUTION.—

1.      failure of the petitioner to comply with any of the requirements regarding

> payment of the docket and other lawful fees, deposit for costs,
> proof of service of the petition,
> the contents of petition
> the documents which should accompany the petition
> The Supreme Court may on its own initiative deny the petition on the ground that

·        the appeal is without merit,
·        is prosecuted manifestly for delay,
·        that the questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to require consideration.

Review discretionary under Rule 45.—A review is not a matter of right, but of sound judicial discretion, and will be granted only when there are special and important reasons therefor.  When allowed:

 (a)            When the court a quo has decided a question of substance, not theretofore determined by the Supreme Court, or has decided it in a way probably not in accord with law or with the applicable decisions of the Supreme Court; or
(b)            When the court a quo has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or so far sanctioned such departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of the power of supervision.

Pleadings and documents that may be required; sanctions.—

1. Supreme Court may require or allow the filing of such pleadings, briefs, memoranda or documents as it may deem necessary within such periods and under such conditions as it may consider appropriate.
2. It may impose the corresponding sanctions in case of non-filing or unauthorized filing of such pleadings and documents or non­compliance with the conditions thereof.

Due course; elevation of records.—If the petition is given due course, the Supreme Court may require the elevation of the complete record of the case or specified parts thereof within fifteen (15) days from notice.

RULE 46 - ORIGINAL CASES (Court of Appeals)

To what actions applicable.—This Rule shall apply to original actions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and quo warranto.

>Actions for annulment of judgment shall be governed by Rule 47,
>Certiorari, prohibition and mandamus by Rule 65,
>Quo warranto by Rule 66.

Contents and filing of petition; effect of non-compliance with requirements.—The petition shall contain

1.      Full names and actual addresses of all the petitioners and respondents,
2.    Concise statement of the matters involved,
3.    Factual background of the case,
4.    Grounds relied upon for the relief prayed for.
5.     In actions filed under Rule 65:
>material dates showing when notice of the judgment or final order or resolution subject thereof was received, when a motion for new trial or reconsideration, if any, was filed and when notice of the denial thereof was received.

6.    Seven (7) clearly legible copies
7.     Affid. of service
8.    Original copy intended for the court indicated as such by the petitioner
9.    Accompanied by:
> a clearly legible duplicate original or certified true copy of the judgment, order, resolution, or ruling subject thereof,
>such material portions of the record as are referred to therein,
>and other documents relevant or pertinent thereto. 

10.                        Verification
11.   AFS Certif.
12. Pay the corresponding docket and other lawful fees to the clerk of court and deposit the amount of P500.00 for costs at the time of the filing of the petition.

Dismissal by minute resolution. - The failure of the petitioner to comply with any of the foregoing requirements shall be sufficient ground for the dismissal of the petition.

Effect of failure to file comment.—When no comment is filed by any of the respondents, the case may be decided on the basis of the record, without prejudice to any disciplinary action which the court may take against the disobedient party.


RULE 50 - DISMISSAL OF APPEAL (Court of Appeals)

Grounds for dismissal of appeal—An appeal may be dismissed by the Court of Appeals, on its own motion or on that of the appellee, on the following grounds:

(a)            Failure of the record on appeal to show on its face that the appeal was taken within the period fixed by these Rules;
(b)            Failure to file the notice of appeal or the record on appeal within the period prescribed by these Rules;
(c)            Failure of the appellant to pay the docket and other lawful fees as provided in section 4 of Rule 41;
(d)            Unauthorized alterations, omissions or additions in the approved record on appeal as provided in section 4 of Rule 44;
(e)            Failure of the appellant to serve and file the required number of copies of his brief or memorandum within the time provided by these Rules;
(f)             Absence of specific assignment of errors in the appellant’s brief, or of page references to the record as required in section 13, paragraphs (a), (c), (d) and (f) of Rule 44;
(g)            Failure of the appellant to take the necessary steps for the correction or completion of the record within the time limited by the court in its order;
(h)            Failure of the appellant to appear at the preliminary conference under Rule 48 or to comply with orders, circulars, or directives of the court without justifiable cause; and
(i)                         The fact that order or judgment appealed from is not appealable.


Dismissal of improper appeal to the Court of Appeals

1.      An appeal under Rule 41 taken from the Regional Trial Court to the Court of Appeals raising only questions of law shall be dismissed, issues purely of law not being reviewable by said court.
Ø Use Rule 45 – petition for review on certiorari directly to the SC. – pure questions of law.
2.    An appeal by notice of appeal instead of by petition for review from the appellate judgment of a Regional Trial Court shall be dismissed.
3.    An appeal erroneously taken to the Court of Appeals shall not be transferred to the appropriate court but shall be dismissed outright.


PROCEDURE IN THE SUPREME COURT
RULE 56 - ORIGINAL AND APPEALED CASES

A. Original Cases

Original cases cognizable.—
1.      Certiorari, prohibition, mandamus,
2.    quo warranto,
3.    habeas corpus,
4.    disciplinary proceedings against members of the judiciary and attorneys,
5.     and cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls may be filed originally in the Supreme Court.

B. Appealed Cases

Mode of appeal—An appeal to the Supreme Court may be taken only by a petition for review on certiorari,
>except in criminal cases where the penalty imposed is
1.      death – automatic review,
2.    reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment – notice of appeal to the CA (not SC, PP v. Mateo).

Grounds for dismissal of appeal.—The appeal may be dismissed motu proprio or on motion of the respondent:

(a)   Failure to take the appeal within the reglementary period;
(b)   Lack of merit in the petition;
(c)               Failure to pay the requisite docket fee and other lawful fees or to make a deposit for costs;
(d)  Failure to comply with the requirements regarding proof of service and contents of and the documents which should accompany the petition;
(e) Failure to comply with any circular, directive or order of the Supreme Court without justifiable cause;
(f)    Error in the choice or mode of appeal; and
(g)   The fact that the case is not appealable to the Supreme Court.

Disposition of improper appeal.—

1.      Except as provided in section 3, Rule 122 regarding appeals in criminal cases where the penalty imposed is death, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, an appeal taken to the Supreme Court by notice of appeal shall be dismissed.

2.    An appeal by certiorari taken to the Supreme Court from the Regional Trial Court submitting issues of fact may be referred to the Court of Appeals for decision or appropriate action. The determination of the Supreme Court on whether or not issues of fact are involved shall be final.

Procedure if opinion is equally divided.—Where the court en banc is equally divided in opinion, or the necessary majority cannot be had:

1.      the original action commenced in the court shall be dismissed;
2.    in appealed cases, the judgment or order appealed from shall stand affirmed;
3.    and on all incidental matters, the petition or motion shall be denied.

Note - Majority vote of SC Division/En Banc needed to reverse decisions and rulings of lower courts.




Thursday, December 26, 2013

BusinessMirror - DBP ‘spokesman-lawyer’ loses round against Ongpin at CA

see - BusinessMirror - DBP ‘spokesman-lawyer’ loses round against Ongpin at CA


"x x x.

THE Court of Appeals (CA) has denied the petition of lawyer Zenaida Ongkiko-Acorda seeking to stop the Commission on Bar Discipline (CBD) of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) from deciding on the disbarment complaint filed against her by businessman Roberto Ongpin.
In a 10-page ruling written by Associate Justice Franchito Diamante, the CA’s Special Fourteenth Division said there was no violation of Acorda’s right to due process on the part of the CBD-IBP that would have warrant the nullification of the September 20, 2012, order issued by Commissioner Eldrid Antiquiera. The CBD-IBP in the said order denied Acorda’s motion for the conduct of a hearing and to subpoena Ongpin and lawyer Alexander Poblador as her adverse witnesses.
Likewise, the CBD-IBP also submitted the disbarment case for report and recommendation on the basis of the evidence gathered.
In her petition filed before the CA, Acorda sought the issuance of a temporary restraining order to enjoin the implementation of the September 20 order of the commission and to subsequently declare null and void the said order.
Acorda argued that the CBD-IBP gravely abused its discretion when Antiquiera denied her request to subpoena Ongpin and Poblador, as well as her right to complete the presentation of her evidence in a proper hearing.
She pointed out that the CBD-IBP can only determine the veracity of the allegations in the complaint against her by conducting a hearing.
It is also during such hearing that the parties could present additional evidence in support of their positions, she said.
The disbarment complaint against Acorda was filed by Ongpin, who accused her of misrepresenting herself as spokesman and counsel for the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) in connection with the graft complaint filed against him for allegedly obtaining behest loans in the amount of P660 million. Ongpin added  that Acorda falsely claimed  that it was the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) that instructed the DBP to investigate him.
In upholding the CBD-IBP’s order, the appellate court explained that Sections 2 and 3 of Rule V of the Rules of Procedure of the CBD showed that it is merely discretionary on the part of the commissioner to conduct a hearing if necessary.
The CA added that it is also not mandatory to have a formal hearing in disbarment proceedings.
“To us, therefore, the finding of whether a hearing is necessary or not rests upon the investigating commissioner’s discretion, and the same should not be given a mandatory interpretation. Simply stated, a formal hearing is not required in disciplinary actions against lawyers,” the CA stressed.
It added that it is within the power and  discretion of the investigating commissioner to determine whether a subpoena may or may not be issued.  Acorda, according to the CA, was given an opportunity to be heard when she filed her answer to the complaint.
“In sum, this Court holds that the respondent Commission did not commit grave abuse of discretion in not granting petitioner’s request to issue subpoena to adverse witnesses and to suspend the period within which to file her position paper and in finding that there was no necessity for a formal type of hearing, which, at the outset, was established to be discretionary on the part of the investigating commissioner,” the CA added.
In his complaint, Ongpin  recounted that in a news conference called at her office on August 10, 2011, that was not attended by a single DBP official, Ongkiko-Acorda distributed a five-page statement to the press in which she claimed that she was the DBP spokesman.
He claimed that statement “was replete with all kinds of malicious statements regarding to my loan with the DBP, which, contrary to her allegations, were entirely aboveboard, totally secured and paid ahead of time.”
Subsequently, in a statement that was issued by DBP officials which  came out in another major daily, it was pointed out that Ongkiko-Acorda was never retained by the DBP as its counsel nor had ever been designated DBP spokesman.
In addition, Ongpin said Ongkiko-Acorda claimed that the DBP had been instructed by the BSP to investigate the Ongpin loans, deliberately neglecting to disclose that the DBP had made the request and that the BSP had only responded to the DBP’s request.
A few days later, Ongpin said Ongkiko-Acorda again representing herself as DBP spokesman in a paid newspaper advertisement, had to retract her statement regarding the BSP’s role and admitted that it was the DBP that had initiated the investigation and only submitted its “findings” to the BSP.
“The paid advertisement-retraction clearly demonstrated the falsehood that Atty. Ongkiko-Acorda, made in her press statement regarding the role of the BSP. She had made a bare-faced false statement she was obviously required by the BSP to retract it to set the records straight,” Ongpin added.
The DBP  has filed criminal and administrative cases against former members of its board of directors over P660 million in loans that the bank granted to an Ongpin company to finance his acquisition of Philex Mining shares.
x x x."

Monday, December 23, 2013

Conflict of interests



"The Court concurs with the IBP’s finding that respondent violated
Rule 15.03 of the Code, but reduced the recommended period of suspension to three (3) months.

Rule 15.03 of the Code reads:

CANON 15 – A LAWYER SHALL OBSERVE CANDOR, FAIRNESS AND LOYALTY IN ALL HIS DEALINGS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH HIS CLIENTS.

Rule 15.03 - A lawyer shall not represent conflicting interests except by written consent of all concerned given after a full disclosure of the facts. (Emphasis supplied)

Under the afore-cited rule, it is explicit that a lawyer is prohibited from representing new clients whose interests oppose those of a former client in any manner, whether or not they are parties in the same action or on totally unrelated cases. The prohibition is founded on the principles of public policy and good taste.26 It behooves lawyers not only to keep inviolate the client's confidence, but also to avoid the appearance of treachery and doubledealing for only then can litigants be encouraged to entrust their secrets to their lawyers, which is of paramount importance in the administration of justice.27 In Hornilla v. Salunat28 (Hornilla), the Court explained the concept of conflict of interest, to wit:

There is conflict of interest when a lawyer represents inconsistent interests of two or more opposing parties. The test is “whether or not in behalf of one client, it is the lawyer's duty to fight for an issue or claim, but it is his duty to oppose it for the other client. In brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he argues for the other client.” This rule covers not only cases in
which confidential communications have been confided, but also those in which no confidence has been bestowed or will be used. Also, there is conflict of interests if the acceptance of the new retainer will require the attorney to perform an act which will injuriously affect his first client in any matter in which he represents him and also whether he will be called upon in his new relation to use against his first client any knowledge acquired through their connection. Another test of the inconsistency of interests is whether the acceptance of a new relation will prevent an attorney from the full discharge of his duty of undivided fidelity and loyalty to his client or invite suspicion of unfaithfulness or double dealing
in the performance thereof.29 (Emphasis supplied; citations omitted).


It must, however, be noted that a lawyer’s immutable duty to a former client does not cover transactions that occurred beyond the lawyer’s employment with the client. The intent of the law is to impose upon the lawyer the duty to protect the client’s interests only on matters that he previously handled for the former client and not for matters that arose after the lawyer-client relationship has terminated.30

Applying the above-stated principles, the Court agrees with the IBP’s finding that respondent represented conflicting interests and, perforce, must be held administratively liable therefor.

Records reveal that respondent was the collaborating counsel not only for Maricar as claimed by him, but for all the Heirs of Antonio in Special
Proceeding No. V-3639. In the course thereof, the Heirs of Trinidad and the
Heirs of Antonio succeeded in removing Emilio as administrator for having
committed acts prejudicial to their interests. Hence, when respondent
proceeded to represent Emilio for the purpose of seeking his reinstatement as administrator in the same case, he clearly worked against the very interest of the Heirs of Antonio – particularly, Karen – in violation of the above-stated rule."

See -
JOSEPHINE L. OROLA, MYRNA
L. OROLA, MANUEL L. OROLA,
MARY ANGELYN OROLABELARGA,
MARJORIE MELBA
OROLA-CALIP, and KAREN
ORO LA,
Complainants,

-versus-

ATTY. JOSEPH ADOR RAMOS,
Respondent.

A.C. No. 9860
Promulgated: SEP 11, 2013.

Habeas corpus; Libel


"The ultimate purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to relieve a person from unlawful restraint. The writ exists as a speedy and effectual remedy to relieve persons from unlawful restraint and as an effective defense of personal freedom. It is issued only for the lone purpose of obtaining relief for those illegally confined or imprisoned without sufficient legal basis. It is not issued when the person is in custody because of a judicial process or a valid judgment.18

Section 4, Rule 102 of the Revised Rules of Court provides when a writ must not be allowed or discharge authorized, to wit:

SEC. 4. When writ not allowed or discharge authorized.―If it appears that the person alleged to be restrained of his liberty is in the custody of an officer under process issued by a court or judge or by virtue of a judgment or order of a court of record, and that the court or judge had jurisdiction to issue the process, render the judgment, or make the order, the writ shall not be allowed; or if the jurisdiction appears after the writ is allowed, the person shall not be discharged by reason of any informality or defect in the process, judgment, or order. Nor shall anything in this rule be held to authorize the discharge of a person charged with or convicted of an offense in the Philippines, or of a person suffering imprisonment under lawful judgment.

In the instant case, Adonis was convicted for libel by the RTC Branch 17, in criminal Case No. 48679-2001. Since his detention was by virtue of a final judgment, he is not entitled to the Writ of Habeas Corpus. He was serving his sentence when the BPP granted him parole, along with six (6) others, on  December 11, 2007.19 While it is true that a convict may be released from prison on parole when he had served the minimum period of his sentence; the pendency of another criminal case, however, is a ground for the disqualification of such convict from being released on parole.20

Notably, at the time he was granted the parole, the second libel case was
pending before the RTC Branch 14.21 In fact, even when the instant petition
was filed, Criminal Case No. 48719-01 was still pending. The issuance of the writ under such circumstance was, therefore, proscribed. There was basis for the respondent to deny his immediate release at that time.

xxx."


See - 
Adonis et al vs. Tesoro et al., GR No. 182855, June 5, 2013.