Friday, February 3, 2012

Qualified theft defined; proper penalty explained

Item No

"x x x.

The elements of the crime of theft as provided for in Article 3089 of the Revised Penal Code are as follows: (1) that there be taking of personal property; (2) that said property belongs to another; (3) that the taking be done with intent to gain; (4) that the taking be done without the consent of the owner; and (5) that the taking be accomplished without the use of violence against or intimidation of persons or force upon things.10 Theft becomes qualified when any of the following circumstances under Article 31011 is present: (1) the theft is committed by a domestic servant; (2) the theft is committed with grave abuse of confidence; (3) the property stolen is either a motor vehicle, mail matter or large cattle; (4) the property stolen consists of coconuts taken from the premises of a plantation; (5) the property stolen is fish taken from a fishpond or fishery; and (6) the property was taken on the occasion of fire, earthquake, typhoon, volcanic eruption, or any other calamity, vehicular accident or civil disturbance.12

Here, the prosecution was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the amount of P797,187.85 taken does not belong to petitioner but to VCCI and that petitioner took it without VCCI’s consent and with grave abuse of confidence by taking advantage of her position as accountant and bookkeeper. The prosecution’s evidence proved that petitioner was entrusted with checks payable to VCCI or Viva by virtue of her position as accountant and bookkeeper. She deposited the said checks to the joint account maintained by VCCI and Jefferson Tan, then withdrew a total of P797,187.85 from said joint account using the pre-signed checks, with her as the payee. In other words, the bank account was merely the instrument through which petitioner stole from her employer VCCI.

x x x

We find no cogent reason to disturb the above findings of the trial court which were affirmed by the CA and fully supported by the evidence on record. Time and again, the Court has held that the facts found by the trial court, as affirmed in toto by the CA, are as a general rule, conclusive upon this Court13 in the absence of any showing of grave abuse of discretion. In this case, none of the exceptions to the general rule on conclusiveness of said findings of facts are applicable.14 The Court gives weight and respect to the trial court’s findings in criminal prosecution because the latter is in a better position to decide the question, having heard the witnesses in person and observed their deportment and manner of testifying during the trial.15 Absent any showing that the lower courts overlooked substantial facts and circumstances, which if considered, would change the result of the case, this Court gives deference to the trial court’s appreciation of the facts and of the credibility of witnesses.

Moreover, we agree with the CA when it gave short shrift to petitioner’s argument that full ownership of the thing stolen needed to be established first before she could be convicted of qualified theft. As correctly held by the CA, the subject of the crime of theft is any personal property belonging to another. Hence, as long as the property taken does not belong to the accused who has a valid claim thereover, it is immaterial whether said offender stole it from the owner, a mere possessor, or even a thief of the property.16 In any event, as stated above, the factual findings of the courts a quo as to the ownership of the amount petitioner stole is conclusive upon this Court, the finding being adequately supported by the evidence on record.

However, notwithstanding the correctness of the finding of petitioner’s guilt, a modification is called for as regards the imposable penalty. On the imposition of the correct penalty, People v. Mercado17 is instructive. Pursuant to said case, in the determination of the penalty for qualified theft, note is taken of the value of the property stolen, which is P797,187.85 in this case. Since the value exceeds P22,000.00, the basic penalty is prision mayor in its minimum and medium periods to be imposed in the maximum period, that is, eight (8) years, eight (8) months and one (1) day to ten (10) years of prision mayor.

To determine the additional years of imprisonment to be added to the basic penalty, the amount ofP22,000.00 is deducted from P797,187.85, which yields a remainder of P775,187.85. This amount is then divided by P10,000.00, disregarding any amount less than P10,000.00. The end result is that 77 years should be added to the basic penalty. However, the total imposable penalty for simple theft should not exceed 20 years. Thus, had petitioner committed simple theft, the penalty would be 20 years of reclusion temporal. As the penalty for qualified theft is two degrees higher, the trial court, as well as the appellate court, should have imposed the penalty of reclusion perpetua."


20 comments:

  1. tanong ko lng po, pwede pa rin po ba ako mag reklamo kahit nangyari eto dalawang taon na ang makalipas?

    salamat po

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pakistani School Teacher Aunty Input Banana In Her White Hairy Pussy Hot Wallpapers,Pakisatni Girls In Rave Party Video

      Priyanka Chopra Hot Bed Room Kissing Scene And Sex Photos,Meera Jasmine Hot Sex with Tamil Director

      Chandigarh girl Shilpa sucking cock till the guy cums in her mouth Video,Ileana without clothes showing boobs and pussy

      Mast Desi Assamese Randi Neelima Bhabhi Showing Her Hot Beauty,Homely South Actress Sneha Pussy Slip

      Sexy Pornstar Lisa Ann Hardcore Anal Sex, Horny Lisa Ann Hairy Pussy Busty Tits Nude Photo After Fucked

      Hot Indian Desi Sexy Masala Mallu Actress Top Show Photos Spicy Collecton Sizzling Aunty

      Afgan Muslim College Girls Raped By American Soldiers, Muslim Girls Raped Video,Naked Virgin Muslim Girls

      Luxury Models Escorts Prauge & Playmates Prague & Beautiful Escorts Praha,Tamil Actress Rambha Spreading Legs Wide

      Indian Teen Girls Gets Groped And Fucked In Crowded Train,Hot Big Tit Blonde Cop Is Fucked Hard By Big Dick

      Indian Futher Forced Ass Point Fuck Her 14 Years Vergin School Girl And Forced To Sucking Her Big Black Dick

      Indian Busty Sexy Girlfriend On Bed And Her BF Shot Her Nude Sex Images By Mobile,Sexy Kolkata Bangla Aunties In Kitchen

      Telegu Tattooed Female Doctor Julia Bond Fucking Her Patient,Deepeka Padukone Real Boobs Picture

      Sunny Leone 3GP/MP4/HD Video,Sunny Leone Nude Hot Image Download,Her First Time Sex Vide,And Her Life Biography

      Nagma Full Nude Spreading legs wide,Mallu Aunty Huge Big Tits Picture,Hot Boobs,Hips Indian Aunty Sucking Hairy Lund And Group Fucking Porn Movie

      Desi Lesibean Sex Scandal Real Porn Adult Movie And More,Beautiful Indian Cute Sweet School Girl Nice Boobs Sucking Big Penis And First Time Enjoying Sex

      Delete
  2. tanong ko rin po,kahit ba duties and resposibilities bilang shoplead at taga pamahala sa shop pwedi po bang ma accuse bilang qualified theft? na ginamit ko yung welding machine sa bahay for emergency porposes at hindi rin nakapaalam sa may ari.

    Salamat po

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tanong ko lang po, may small school po kami. Yung pinagkakatiwalaan po namin na teacher, hindi po niremit yung mga payments na nareceive niya. Nalaman lang po namin sa parents nung nagfollow up kami ng payments. Umabot na po sa P 150,000 ang nakuha niya, bukod pa yung isang booklet na resibo na ayaw na niyang ilabas. Ano po ba ang pwedeng ikaso sa kanya? Kung makikipagsettle naman po ng maayos, ano po ang tamang interest na ipataw sa nagalaw niyang pera?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good day po! Qualified for Theft po ba yung taong sinasabi saknila yung property kahit hindi po? Kasi we are selling our house and lot but, some interested people refuse it po. because there is this person saying that pur house po is under her name at kailangan pa daw po ng pirma niya at may kaso daw po uing bahay. but the truth po is sa mama ko po nakapangalan yung bahay and wlang kaso po talaga yun. Counted po ba yun sa theft? or may iba pa pong pwedeng i-file ng case, since they making stories dun sa bahay. kaya nadidiscourage yung taong bumili? Anu po bang dapat ikaso?

    ReplyDelete
  6. ilang year makukulong pag npatunayang guilty ka sa halaganf 1800?? qualified theft ba dpat sia ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. good morning atty. hingi ko legal advice tungkol sa sasakyan na sagi ng isang company truck at hanggang ngayon isan buwan na this feb. 21 at wala parin aksyon ang company..ang sabi nila hintayin nalang daw ang issurance nila ....ano ang dapat kung gawin?..

    ReplyDelete
  8. 3months pa lang ayaw ng ibalik ang gamit ko di na rin ako binayaran ng utang, tanging hawak ko lang mga picture at text msgs ng conversation namin regarding the issue.. possible for theft na ba yun?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Tanong ko lang po attorney bakit parang di niyo sinasagot ang mga tanong ng nagtatanong. Salamat po.

    ReplyDelete
  10. tanung ko lang po bakit ang pyansa d2 sa amin 32,000? samantalang nkalagay nman po na 22,000 lang...at pwedi pang 10,000...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tanong ko lang po atty. bakit po 20 years in prison ang mapapatunanyang guity sa kasong qualified thef? Hindi po ba masyadong matagal yung 20 years, kung tutuusin pero lang naman po ang involve sa kasong ito? Kumpara po sa buhay na masisira katulad po ng maiiwan ng akusado.. May mga paraan po ba na pwedeng gawin para kahit dene,anda ka at ayaw makipag areglo ng nag complaint eh pwedeng mag desisyon ang uskado para ma solbahan ang isang kaso kahit ayaw ng nag demanda?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Can it be considered as qualified theft if a person who happened to be the husband of my niece who can freely go in and out of my house stole 10k from my purse which was kept in my unlocked closet? No else entered our house on the day the money was stolen except him. If I report the matter to the police, would the authorities apprehend him right away? Kindly educate me sir what charges should I file regarding the said incident. Your advice would be highly appreciated. Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Atty. is it considered qualified theft if my neighbor informed the mailman that I live in their house, thus having the mail man deliver all my bills to them?

    ReplyDelete
  14. magandang umaga po.. itatanong kom lang po sana f ano po ang pwedi kung gawin sa isinampang kaso ng dati kung boss na qualified theft sakin. nung nag kahiwalay po kc kami my dala po ako na pera na nag kaka halaga ng 395,000 na pambayad sa down payment na sasakyan na binigay nya sakin at pambayad sa isang member ng company nya. ngaun po nag disition po ako na diko na kunin ung sasakyan kundi ibayad nalang sa mga tao na member ng company kc po 1.9M po ang kailangan bayaran at un po ang aking ginaya at nasa akin po ang mga cheke na binayaran ko sa tao at pina alam ko po un sa aking dating boss. ano po ang pwedi kung gawin. sana po matulungan nyo po ako. maraming salamat po sa inyo..

    ReplyDelete
  15. ask ko lang po kung kapatid mo po ang kumuha ng points sa timezone card mo worth 1,700 na points pero walang paalam pwede po ba pumasok sa kasong qualified theft yun

    ReplyDelete
  16. Atty.pde po ba kmeng kasuhan ng qualified theft kht cnasabi nilang P.O or PAUTANG ng gasoline station nag sampa po kc kmi ng kaso sa laybor dhl po dn kinasuhan kme ng qualified theft yn po kasing binabayad sa P.O ay cheake at sa office na po yn binabayadan pro pinalalabas nila na ninakaw dw po namin yng halagang 600k pro yng mga ebidensiya nila ibang pangalan mga naka juty pa po sa gasoline station pro kme pong mga nag laybor ang kinasuhan nila? Ano po ba dpt naming gawin?


    Salamat po

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hello. Nabasa ko po ang blog na ito in my search for a solution to my problem. I am a self employed freelance photographer and usually get my clients from event organizers, party suppliers and other third party referrals. Ang tanong ko po ay kung may habol ba ako sa mga kliyenteng hindi nagbayad, or yung mga kliyenteng labis manghingi ng serbisyo na hindi nman covered ng package services rates ko?.Is this can be considered as "THEFT OF SERVICES", or any other form of theft? For example, si CLIENT A: down payment lang ang binayad, then after submitting the photo prints, album, and all raw shots ay mangangakong babayaran o huhulugan ang kabuuang payment sa susunod na pagkikita hanggang umabot na ng buwan at taon, hanggang sa nakalimutan na.... Si CLIENT B naman po ay P1500 pesos down payment din ang binayad pero nung sinubmit ko yung 11 inch x 14 inch framed portrait, DVD copy of more than 2500 r5aw shots at 100 4R size prints in magnetic album ay hindi nagustuhan dahil gusto daw nya mas 5R prints at story book style - bagay na wela sa napag-usapang package rate ko na babayaran nya ng P3000 pesos (story book production cost ay P2000 and up na, at wala nang matitira para sa service charge ko pag yun ang hiningi nya).. Kapag hindi ko daw ginawa ang demand nya ay magpa-refund na lng daw ng bayad, pero P1500 pesos lang po ang binayad nya bilang down payment at nagastos ko na yun sa first printing. Tapos nasa kanya na ang lahat ng raw copies ng 2500 shots in DVD at yung framed portrait na 11 inch x 14 inch. Ibig pong sabihin, wala pa po siyang bayad sa service charge ko pero nagpapa-full refund ng down payment nya. I am aware of the Consumers Rights, and that I see to it that costumers are always happy when dealing with my services. Pero kung sakaling baliktarin ang sitwasyon at ang kliyente ang abusado, meron po kayang batas na magpoprotekta sa isang tulad kong self employed?

    Maraming salamat po sa inyong magiging tugon.

    ReplyDelete