"There is no quibble that Sideño, through his counsel, had taken a wrong procedure. Inasmuch as Sideño is a low-ranking public officer, having a salary grade below 27, he should have sought relief on the RTC verdict of conviction from the SB, pursuant to P.D. No. 1606, as amended by R.A. No. 10660, specifically Section 4 thereof..."
[ G.R. No. 235640, September 03, 2020 ]
ROLANDO S. SIDEÑO, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/66331
