Saturday, January 23, 2010

Phlippines fails economic freedom index

May I reproduce below the portion of the 2010 world economic freedom report of the conservative Heritage Foundation referring to the Philippine situation, for the information of the visitors of this blog.

Among other things, the report states one obvious and demoralizing fact that all Filipinos already know: “Corruption is perceived as pervasive in the Philippines. The Philippines ranks 141st out of 179 countries in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2008, a decline from 2007. A culture of corruption is long-standing, and enforcement of anti-corruption laws is inconsistent.”

The overall negative judgment of the Foundation on the Philippine situation is quoted below:

“The Philippines has an economic freedom score of 56.3, making its economy the 109th freest in the 2010 Index. Its score is 0.4 point lower than last year, reflecting small reductions in monetary freedom and freedom from corruption. The Philippines ranks 20th out of 41 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is slightly below the world and regional averages.”

As to the state of the justice system in the country, here is what the report painfully concludes: “The judicial system remains weak and vulnerable to political influence.”

Here is the full text of the report on the Philippine situation:


The Philippines has an economic freedom score of 56.3, making its economy the 109th freest in the 2010 Index. Its score is 0.4 point lower than last year, reflecting small reductions in monetary freedom and freedom from corruption. The Philippines ranks 20th out of 41 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is slightly below the world and regional averages.

The Philippines scores above the world average in half of the 10 economic freedoms. The government has pursued a series of structural reforms to improve the entrepreneurial environment and develop a stronger private sector that generates more dynamic job growth. Overall progress has been mixed, but some fiscal reforms have been accomplished. The top corporate tax rate has been reduced, and progress in privatization and fiscal prudence has helped to reduce the public debt. Improving tax administration remains a priority.

The Philippines is weak in business freedom, investment freedom, property rights, and freedom from corruption. The government imposes formal and non-formal barriers to foreign investment. Reflecting a lack of domestic economic dynamism, the Philippines still relies heavily on remittances from abroad. The judicial system remains weak and vulnerable to political influence.
________________________________________

Background

The Philippines’ diverse population, which speaks more than 80 languages and dialects, is spread over 7,000 islands in the Western Pacific Ocean. The country returned to democracy in 1986 after two decades of autocratic rule. President Gloria Arroyo took office in 2001 and since then has weathered multiple impeachment attempts. The government’s failure to do anything substantial to liberalize the economy has set back efforts to attract much-needed foreign investment in basic industries and infrastructure, and the Philippines continues a long slide from being one of Asia’s richest economies to being one of its poorest. The economy relies heavily on emigrants’ remittances equivalent to about 10 percent of GDP.
________________________________________

Business Freedom 48.1

The overall freedom to start, operate, and close a business is limited under the Philippines’ regulatory environment. Starting a business takes an average of 52 days, compared to the world average of 35 days. Obtaining a business license takes less than the world average of 218 days. Closing a business can be a difficult and lengthy process.
________________________________________

Trade Freedom 77.8

The Philippines’ weighted average tariff rate was 3.6 percent in 2007. Some high tariffs, import and export restrictions, quotas and tariff rate quotas, services market access barriers, import and export taxes, import licensing requirements, restrictive and non-transparent standards, labeling and other regulations, domestic bias in government procurement, inconsistent and non-transparent customs valuation and administration, export subsidies, widespread corruption, and weak protection of intellectual property rights add to the cost of trade. Fifteen points were deducted from the Philippines’ trade freedom score to account for non-tariff barriers.
________________________________________

Fiscal Freedom 78.8

The Philippines has relatively high tax rates. The top income tax rate is 32 percent. The top corporate tax rate is 30 percent, down from 35 percent as of January 1, 2009. Other taxes include a value-added tax (VAT), a real property tax, and an inheritance tax. In the most recent year, overall tax revenue as a percentage of GDP was 14.0 percent. Despite domestic political pressure, authorities did not repeal the VAT on petroleum products during the financial crisis.
________________________________________

Government Spending 91.2

Total government expenditures, including consumption and transfer payments, are low. In the most recent year, government spending equaled 17.1 percent of GDP. Privatization of the power sector continues, with two more generating plants privatized in the past year.
________________________________________

Monetary Freedom 72.7

Inflation has been moderately high, averaging 7.4 percent between 2006 and 2008. The government influences prices through state-owned enterprises and utilities and controls the prices of electricity distribution, water, telecommunications, and most transportation services. Price ceilings are usually imposed on basic commodities only in emergencies, and presidential authority to impose controls to check inflation or ease social tension is rarely exercised. Ten points were deducted from the Philippines’ monetary freedom score to account for policies that distort domestic prices.
________________________________________

Investment Freedom 40.0

Foreign investment is restricted in a number of sectors. All foreign investments are screened and must be registered with the government. Regulatory inconsistency and lack of transparency, corruption, and inadequate infrastructure hinder investment. Dispute resolution can be cumbersome and complex, and the enforcement of contracts is weak. Residents and non-residents may hold foreign exchange accounts. Payments, capital transactions, and transfers are subject to some restrictions, controls, quantitative limits, and authorizations. Foreign investors may lease but not own land.
________________________________________

Financial Freedom 50.0

Banking dominates the growing financial sector, handling more than 90 percent of financial activity. In general, the financial system welcomes foreign competition, and capital standards and oversight have improved. Consolidation has progressed, and non-performing loans have gradually declined to less than 5 percent of total loans. The banking sector has 38 commercial banks, five of which dominate the sector. Two large state-owned banks account for about 15 percent of total assets. A small government Islamic bank serves Muslim citizens in the South. Credit is generally available at market terms, but banks are required to lend specified portions of their funds to preferred sectors. The non-bank financial sector remains small. Capital markets are centered on the Philippine Stock Exchange. The impact of the global financial crisis on banking has been relatively constrained because of the sector’s very limited exposure to failed or distressed international financial institutions.
________________________________________

Property Rights 30.0

The judicial system is weak. Judges are nominally independent, but some are corrupt or have been appointed strictly for political reasons. Organized crime is a serious problem. Despite some progress, enforcement of intellectual property rights remains problematic.
________________________________________

Freedom From Corruption 23.0

Corruption is perceived as pervasive. The Philippines ranks 141st out of 179 countries in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2008, a decline from 2007. A culture of corruption is long-standing, and enforcement of anti-corruption laws is inconsistent.
________________________________________

Labor Freedom 51.9

Labor regulations in the Philippines are inflexible. The non-salary cost of employing a worker is low, but dismissing an employee is difficult.


See:
http://www.heritage.org/index/Country/Philippines