Thursday, May 10, 2012

Breach of contract; when 12% interest p.a. applies - G.R. No. 175139

G.R. No. 175139

"x x x.



The interest at the rate of 12% is applicable in the instant case.


Anent the interest rate, the general rule is that the applicable rate of interest “shall be computed in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.”[31]   Absent any stipulation, the applicable rate of interest shall be 12% per annum “when the obligation arises out of a loan or a forbearance of money, goods or credits.  In other cases, it shall be six percent (6%).”[32]  In this case, the parties did not stipulate as to the applicable rate of interest.  The only question remaining therefore is whether the 6% as provided under Article 2209 of the Civil Code, or 12% under Central Bank Circular No. 416, is due.

The contract involved in this case is admittedly not a loan but a Conditional Deed of Sale.  However, the contract provides that the seller (petitioner) must return the payment made by the buyer (respondent-spouses) if the conditions are not fulfilled. There is no question that they have in fact, not been fulfilled as the seller (petitioner) has admitted this.  Notwithstanding demand by the buyer (respondent-spouses),  the  seller (petitioner)  has  failed  to  return  the money and

should be considered in default from the time that demand was made on September 27, 2000.

Even if the transaction involved a Conditional Deed of Sale, can the stipulation governing the return of the money be considered as a forbearance of money which required payment of interest at the rate of 12%?  We believe so.

In Crismina Garments, Inc. v. Court of Appeals,[33] “forbearance” was defined as a “contractual obligation of lender or creditor to refrain during a given period of time, from requiring the borrower or debtor to repay a loan or debt then due and payable.” This definition describes a loan where a debtor is given a period within which to pay a loan or debt.  In such case, “forbearance of money, goods or credits” will have no distinct definition from a loan.  We believe however, that the phrase “forbearance of money, goods or credits” is meant to have a separate meaning from a loan, otherwise there would have been no need to add that phrase as a loan is already sufficiently defined in the Civil Code.[34]  Forbearance of money, goods or credits should therefore refer to arrangements other than loan agreements, where a person acquiesces to the temporary use of his money, goods or credits pending happening of certain events or fulfillment of certain conditions. In this case, the respondent-spouses parted with their money even before the conditions were fulfilled.  They have therefore allowed or granted forbearance to the seller (petitioner) to use their money pending fulfillment of the conditions.  They were deprived of the use of their money for the period pending fulfillment of the conditions and when those conditions were breached, they are entitled not only to the return of the principal amount paid, but also to compensation for the use of their money.  And the compensation for the use of their money, absent any stipulation, should be the same rate of legal interest applicable to a loan since the use or deprivation of funds is similar to a loan.

Petitioner’s unwarranted withholding of the money which rightfully pertains to respondent-spouses amounts to forbearance of money which can be considered as an involuntary loan.  Thus, the applicable rate of interest is 12% per annum.  In Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals,[35]cited in Crismina Garments, Inc. v. Court of Appeals,[36]  the Court suggested the following guidelines:

I.                When an obligation, regardless of its source, i.e., law, contracts, quasi-contracts, delicts or quasi-delicts is breached, the contravenor can be held liable for damages.  The provisions under Title XVIII on ‘Damages’ of the Civil Code govern in determining the measure of recoverable damages.

II.           With regard particularly to an award of interest in the concept of actual and compensatory damages, the rate of interest, as well as the accrual thereof, is imposed, as follows:

1.              When the obligation is breached, and it consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., a loan or forbearance of money, the interest due should be that which may have been stipulated in writing. Furthermore, the interest due shall itself earn legal interest from the time it is judicially demanded.  In the absence of stipulation, the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum to be computed from default, i.e., from judicial or extrajudicial demand under and subject to the provisions of Article 1169 of the Civil Code.

2.              When an obligation, not constituting a loan or forbearance of money, is breached, an interest on the amount of damages awarded may be imposed at the discretion of the court at the rate of 6% per annum.  No interest, however, shall be adjudged on unliquidated claims or damages except when or until the demand can be established with reasonable certainty. Accordingly, where the demand is established with reasonable certainty, the interest shall begin to run from the time the claim is made judicially or extrajudicially (Art. 1169, Civil Code) but when such certainty cannot be so reasonably established at the time the demand is made, the interest shall begin to run only from the date the judgment of the court is made (at which time the quantification of damages may be deemed to have been reasonably ascertained).  The actual base for the computation of legal interest shall, in any case, be on the amount finally adjudged.

3.              When the judgment of the court awarding a sum of money becomes final and executory, the rate of legal interest, whether the case falls under paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, above, shall be 12% per annum from such finality until its satisfaction, this interim period being deemed to be by then an equivalent to a forbearance of credit.[37] 


Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals[38]and its predecessor case,Reformina v. Tongol[39] both involved torts cases and hence, there was no forbearance of money, goods, or credits.  Further, the amount claimed (i.e., damages) could not be established with reasonable certainty at the time the claim was made.  Hence, we arrived at a different ruling in those cases.

Since the date of demand which is September 27, 2000 was satisfactorily established during trial, then the interest rate of 12% should be reckoned from said date of demand until the principal amount and the interest thereon is fully satisfied.
 x  x x."