Thursday, May 23, 2013

US Supreme Court Takes on Constitutionality of Prayer at Govt Meetings - CourtSide

see - Supreme Court Takes on Constitutionality of Prayer at Govt Meetings - CourtSide


Mandatory Christian prayers in public/government functions or activities or mandatory display of Christian emblems, icons, or statues is seen by freedom of religion activists as violative of the establishment clause of the Freedom of Religion provisions of the US and even the PHL Constitutions. Read a related legal article below.


"x x x.


The relationship between government and religion will once again become a point of discussion at the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Justices agreed to consider whether a New York town could open meetings with a prayer.
Two residents sued Greece, New York, in 2008, saying it was endorsing Christianity, a violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment guarantee of separation of church and state.
The Supreme Court ruled in a 1983 case, Marsh v. Chambers, that legislative sessions could begin with a prayer in most circumstances, citing the "unique history" of the practice throughout U.S. history.
The 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York last year unanimously ruled against the city's policy in the attached ruling. Still, other courts around the country have found such invocations -- if inclusive and limited in scope -- to be permissible.
x x x."