Tuesday, May 17, 2016

PHILIPPINES’ UNCLOS ARBITRAL CASE VS. CHINA; EXPLOITATION OF THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA RESOURCES; AND POTENTIAL IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES OF PRESIDENT-ELECT RODRIGO DUTERTE.


EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE

The 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA (UNCLOS) is very specific and clear about our rights as an archipelagic state.

Article 56 (Rights, jurisdiction and duties of the coastal State in the exclusive economic zone), Part V, of UNCLOS provides, inter alia, that in the 200-nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the coastal State has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone, such as the production of energy from the water, currents and winds. Thus:
  
“x x x.

1.       In the 200-nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the coastal State has:

(a)     sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone, such as the production of energy from the water, currents and winds;

(b)     jurisdiction as provided for in the relevant provisions of this Convention with regard to:

(i)      the establishment and use of artificial islands, installations and structures;
(ii)     marine scientific research;
 (iii)   the protection and preservation of the marine environment;

(c)     other rights and duties provided for in this Convention.

2.      In exercising its rights and performing its duties under this Convention in the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State shall have due regard to the rights and duties of other States and shall act in a manner compatible with the provisions of this Convention.
3.      The rights set out in this article with respect to the seabed and subsoil shall be exercised in accordance with Part VI.

X x x.”

Article 60 (Artificial islands, installations and structures in the exclusive economic zone), Part V, of UNCLOS, provides, inter alia, that the coastal State (Philippines) shall have exclusive jurisdiction over such artificial islands, installations and structures, including jurisdiction with regard to customs, fiscal, health, safety and immigration laws and regulations. Thus:
   
“x x x.

1.       In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State shall have the exclusive right to construct and to authorize and regulate the construction, operation and use of:

(a)     artificial islands;

(b)     installations and structures for the purposes provided for in article 56 and other economic purposes;

(c)     installations and structures which may interfere with the exercise of the rights of the coastal State in the zone.

2.      The coastal State shall have exclusive jurisdiction over such artificial islands, installations and structures, including jurisdiction with regard to customs, fiscal, health, safety and immigration laws and regulations.

3.      Due notice must be given of the construction of such artificial islands, installations or structures, and permanent means for giving warning of their presence must be maintained. Any installations or structures which are abandoned or disused shall be removed to ensure safety of navigation, taking into account any generally accepted international standards established in this regard by the competent international organization. Such removal shall also have due regard to fishing, the protection of the marine environment and the rights and duties of other States. Appropriate publicity shall be given to the depth, position and dimensions of any installations or structures not entirely removed.

4.      The coastal State may, where necessary, establish reasonable safety zones around such artificial islands, installations and structures in which it may take appropriate measures to ensure the safety both of navigation and of the artificial islands, installations and structures.

5.       The breadth of the safety zones shall be determined by the coastal State, taking into account applicable international standards. Such zones shall be designed to ensure that they are reasonably related to the nature and function of the artificial islands, installations or structures, and shall not exceed a distance of 500 meters around them, measured from each point of their outer edge, except as authorized by generally accepted international standards or as recommended by the competent international organization. Due notice shall be given of the extent of safety zones.

6.      All ships must respect these safety zones and shall comply with generally accepted international standards regarding navigation in the vicinity of artificial islands, installations, structures and safety zones.

7.       Artificial islands, installations and structures and the safety zones around them may not be established where interference may be caused to the use of recognized sea lanes essential to international navigation.

8.      Artificial islands, installations and structures do not possess the status of islands. They have no territorial sea of their own, and their presence does not affect the delimitation of the territorial sea, the exclusive economic zone or the continental shelf.

X x x.”


Article61 (Conservation of the living resources), Part V, of UNCLOS provides, inter alia, that the coastal State (Philippines), taking into account the best scientific evidence available to it, shall ensure through proper conservation and management measures that the maintenance of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone is not endangered by over-exploitation. As appropriate, the coastal State and competent international organizations, whether subregional, regional or global, shall cooperate to this end. Thus:

“x x x.

1.       The coastal State shall determine the allowable catch of the living resources in its exclusive economic zone.

2.      The coastal State, taking into account the best scientific evidence available to it, shall ensure through proper conservation and management measures that the maintenance of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone is not endangered by over-exploitation. As appropriate, the coastal State and competent international organizations, whether subregional, regional or global, shall cooperate to this end.

3.      Such measures shall also be designed to maintain or restore populations of harvested species at levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield, as qualified by relevant environmental and economic factors, including the economic needs of coastal fishing communities and the special requirements of developing States, and taking into account fishing patterns, the interdependence of stocks and any generally recommended international minimum standards, whether subregional, regional or global.

4.      In taking such measures the coastal State shall take into consideration the effects on species associated with or dependent upon harvested species with a view to maintaining or restoring populations of such associated or dependent species above levels at which their reproduction may become seriously threatened.

5.       Available scientific information, catch and fishing effort statistics, and other data relevant to the conservation of fish stocks shall be contributed and exchanged on a regular basis through competent international organizations, whether subregional, regional or global, where appropriate and with participation by all States concerned, including States whose nationals are allowed to fish in the exclusive economic zone.

X x x.”


Article62 (Utilization of the living resources), Part V, of UNCLOS provides, inter alia, that the coastal State (Philippines) shall determine its capacity to harvest the living resources of the exclusive economic zone. Where the coastal State does not have the capacity to harvest the entire allowable catch, it shall, through agreements or other arrangements and pursuant to the terms, conditions, laws and regulations referred to in paragraph 4, give other States access to the surplus of the allowable catch, having particular regard to the provisions of articles 69 and 70, especially in relation to the developing States mentioned therein. Thus:

“x x x.

1.       The coastal State shall promote the objective of optimum utilization of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone without prejudice to article 61.

2.      The coastal State shall determine its capacity to harvest the living resources of the exclusive economic zone. Where the coastal State does not have the capacity to harvest the entire allowable catch, it shall, through agreements or other arrangements and pursuant to the terms, conditions, laws and regulations referred to in paragraph 4, give other States access to the surplus of the allowable catch, having particular regard to the provisions of articles 69 and 70, especially in relation to the developing States mentioned therein.

3.      In giving access to other States to its exclusive economic zone under this article, the coastal State shall take into account all relevant factors, including, inter alia, the significance of the living resources of the area to the economy of the coastal State concerned and its other national interests, the provisions of articles 69 and 70, the requirements of developing States in the subregion or region in harvesting part of the surplus and the need to minimize economic dislocation in States whose nationals have habitually fished in the zone or which have made substantial efforts in research and identification of stocks.

4.      Nationals of other States fishing in the exclusive economic zone shall comply with the conservation measures and with the other terms and conditions established in the laws and regulations of the coastal State. These laws and regulations shall be consistent with this Convention and may relate, inter alia, to the following:

(a)     licensing of fishermen, fishing vessels and equipment, including payment of fees and other forms of remuneration, which, in the case of developing coastal States, may consist of adequate compensation in the field of financing, equipment and technology relating to the fishing industry;

(b)     determining the species which may be caught, and fixing quotas of catch, whether in relation to particular stocks or groups of stocks or catch per vessel over a period of time or to the catch by nationals of any State during a specified period;

(c)     regulating seasons and areas of fishing, the types, sizes and amount of gear, and the types, sizes and number of fishing vessels that may be used;

(d)     fixing the age and size of fish and other species that may be caught;

(e)     specifying information required of fishing vessels, including catch and effort statistics and vessel position reports;

(f)      requiring, under the authorization and control of the coastal State, the conduct of specified fisheries research programmes and regulating the conduct of such research, including the sampling of catches, disposition of samples and reporting of associated scientific data;

(g)     the placing of observers or trainees on board such vessels by the coastal State;

(h)     the landing of all or any part of the catch by such vessels in the ports of the coastal State;

(i)      terms and conditions relating to joint ventures or other cooperative arrangements;

(j)      requirements for the training of personnel and the transfer of fisheries technology, including enhancement of the coastal State's capability of undertaking fisheries research;
(k)     enforcement procedures.
5.       Coastal States shall give due notice of conservation and management laws and regulations.

X x x.”

Article73 (Enforcement of laws and regulations of the coastal State), Part V, of UNCLOS provides, inter alia, that the coastal State (Philippines) may, in the exercise of its sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve and manage the living resources in the exclusive economic zone, take such measures, including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations adopted by it in conformity with this Convention. Thus:

“x x x.

1.       The coastal State may, in the exercise of its sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve and manage the living resources in the exclusive economic zone, take such measures, including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations adopted by it in conformity with this Convention.

2.      Arrested vessels and their crews shall be promptly released upon the posting of reasonable bond or other security.

3.      Coastal State penalties for violations of fisheries laws and regulations in the exclusive economic zone may not include imprisonment, in the absence of agreements to the contrary by the States concerned, or any other form of corporal punishment.

4.      In cases of arrest or detention of foreign vessels the coastal State shall promptly notify the flag State, through appropriate channels, of the action taken and of any penalties subsequently imposed.

X x x.”


CONTINENTAL SHELF

Part VI of UNCLOS speaks of the rights of the Philippines to its 200-nautical mile continental shelf.

Article76 (Definition of the continental shelf), Part V of UNCLOS defines the continental shelf as follows:

“x x x.

1.       The continental shelf of a coastal State comprises the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas that extend beyond its territorial sea throughout the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin, or to a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured where the outer edge of the continental margin does not extend up to that distance.

X x x.

3.      The continental margin comprises the submerged prolongation of the land mass of the coastal State, and consists of the seabed and subsoil of the shelf, the slope and the rise. It does not include the deep ocean floor with its oceanic ridges or the subsoil thereof.

X x x.


Article77 (Rights of the coastal State over the continental shelf), Part V, of UNCLOS speaks of the rights of the coastal State (Philippines) over its continental shelf, to wit:

“x x x.

1.       The coastal State exercises over the continental shelf sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring it and exploiting its natural resources.

2.      The rights referred to in paragraph 1 are exclusive in the sense that if the coastal State does not explore the continental shelf or exploit its natural resources, no one may undertake these activities without the express consent of the coastal State.

3.      The rights of the coastal State over the continental shelf do not depend on occupation, effective or notional, or on any express proclamation.

4.      The natural resources referred to in this Part consist of the mineral and other non-living resources of the seabed and subsoil together with living organisms belonging to sedentary species, that is to say, organisms which, at the harvestable stage, either are immobile on or under the seabed or are unable to move except in constant physical contact with the seabed or the subsoil.

X x x.”


CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ON NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY

 Article XII of the 1987 Constitution refers to the “National Economy and Patrimony”.

Section 2, Article XII provides that all lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State.

Further, it provides that:

(1)             With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be alienated.

(2)            The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the State.

(3)            The State may directly undertake such activities, or it may enter into co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens.

(4)            Such agreements may be for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law.

(5)            In cases of water rights for irrigation, water supply, fisheries, or industrial uses other than the development of water power, beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the grant.

(6)            The State shall protect the nation's marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens.

(7)            The President may enter into agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving either technical or financial assistance for large-scale exploration, development, and utilization of minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils according to the general terms and conditions provided by law, based on real contributions to the economic growth and general welfare of the country.

(8)            In such agreements, the State shall promote the development and use of local scientific and technical resources.

(9)            The President shall notify the Congress of every contract entered into in accordance with this provision, within thirty days from its execution.

Section 9, Article XII provides that the Congress may establish an independent economic and planning agency (National Economic and Development Authority) headed by the President, which shall, after consultations with the appropriate public agencies, various public sectors, and local government units, recommend to Congress, and implement continuing integrated and coordinated programs and policies for national development.

Section 10, Article XII provides that the Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency (NEDA), when the national interest dictates, reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investments.

Further, it provides:

(1)             The Congress shall enact measures that will encourage the formation and operation of enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos.

(2)            In the grant of rights, privileges, and concessions covering the national economy and patrimony, the State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos.

(3)            The State shall regulate and exercise authority over foreign investments within its national jurisdiction and in accordance with its national goals and priorities.

Section 11, Article XII provides that no franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, nor shall such franchise, certificate, or authorization be exclusive in character or for a longer period than fifty years.  FURTHER:

(1)             Neither shall any such franchise or right be granted except under the condition that it shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires.

(2)            The State shall encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public.

(3)            The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of any public utility enterprise shall be limited to their proportionate share in its capital, and all the executive and managing officers of such corporation or association must be citizens of the Philippines.


Section 22, Article XII provides that acts which circumvent or negate any of the provisions of Article XII shall be considered inimical to the national interest and subject to criminal and civil sanctions, as may be provided by law.


PREAMBLE

The Preamble of the 1987 Constitution provides we have adopted it to promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace.


NATIONAL TERRITORY

Article I (National Territory) of the 1987 Constitution defines our national territory as comprising the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas.

The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.”

PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES

Article II of the 1987 Constitution refers to the “Declaration of Principles and State Policies”.

Sec. 7, Article II provides that the State shall pursue an independent foreign policy. In its relations with other states the paramount consideration shall be national sovereignty, territorial integrity, national interest, and the right to self-determination.

Section 19, Article II provides that the State shall develop a self-reliant and independent national economy effectively controlled by Filipinos.


IMPEACHMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Article XI speaks of the provisions on “Accountability of Public Officers” of the 1987 Constitution.

Section 1, Article XI provides that public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency, act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.

Section 2, Article XI provides that the President, Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office, on IMPEACHMENT for, and conviction of, culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.

The impeachment procedures are provided in Section 3, Article XI:

“(1) The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment.

(2) A verified complaint may be filed by any Member of the House of Representatives or by any citizen upon a resolution of endorsement by any Member thereof, which shall be included in the Order of Business within ten session days, and referred to the proper Committee within three session days thereafter. The Committee, after hearing, and by a majority vote of all its Members, shall submit its report to the House within sixty session days from such referral, together with the corresponding resolution. The resolution shall be calendared for consideration by the House within ten session days from receipt thereof.

(3) A vote of at least one-third of all the Members of the House shall be necessary either to affirm a favorable resolution with the Articles of Impeachment of the Committee, or override its contrary resolution. The vote of each Member shall be recorded.

(4) In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed.

(5) No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year.

(6) The Senate shall have the sole power to try and decide all cases of impeachment. When sitting for that purpose, the Senators shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the Philippines is on trial, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall preside, but shall not vote. No person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate.

(7) Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than removal from office and disqualification to hold any office under the Republic of the Philippines, but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to prosecution, trial, and punishment according to law.

(8) The Congress shall promulgate its rules on impeachment to effectively carry out the purpose of this section.”

OMBUDSMAN

Section 5, Article XI creates the independent Office of the Ombudsman, composed of the Ombudsman to be known as Tanodbayan, one overall Deputy, and at least one Deputy each for Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. A separate Deputy for the military establishment may likewise be appointed.

Section 12, Article XI provides that the Ombudsman and his Deputies, as protectors of the people, shall act promptly on complaints filed in any form or manner against public officials or employees of the Government, or any agency, subdivision or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations, and shall, in appropriate cases, notify the complainants of the actions taken and the result thereof.

Section 13, Article XI provides for the powers of the Ombudsman:

The Office of the Ombudsman shall have the following powers, functions, and duties:

“(1) Investigate on its own, or on complaint by any person, any act or omission of any public official, employee, office or agency, when such act or omission appears to be illegal, unjust, improper, or inefficient.

(2) Direct, upon complaint or at its own instance, any public official or employee of the Government, or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, as well as of any government-owned or controlled corporation with original charter, to perform and expedite any act or duty required by law, or to stop, prevent, and correct any abuse or impropriety in the performance of duties.

(3) Direct the officer concerned to take appropriate action against a public official or employee at fault, and recommend his removal, suspension, demotion, fine, censure, or prosecution, and ensure compliance therewith.

(4) Direct the officer concerned, in any appropriate case, and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, to furnish it with copies of documents relating to contracts and transactions entered into by his office involving the disbursement or use of public funds or properties, and report any irregularity to the Commission on Audit for appropriate action.

(5) Request any government agency for assistance and information necessary in the discharge of its responsibilities, and to examine, if necessary, pertinent records and documents.

(6) Publicize matters covered by its investigation when circumstances so warrant and with due prudence.

(7) Determine the causes of inefficiency, red tape, mismanagement, fraud, and corruption in the Government and make recommendations for their elimination and the observance of high standards of ethics and efficiency.

(8) Promulgate its rules and procedure and exercise such other powers or perform such functions or duties as may be provided by law.”


POSSIBLE IMPEACHABLE ACTS OF PRESIDENT-ELECT RODRIGO DUTERTE IN RELATION TO THE MARITIME ENTITLEMENTS AND NATIONAL PATRIMONY OF THE PHILIPPINES LOCATED WITHIN ITS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE (EEZ) AND CONTINENTAL SHELF (CS) IN THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA/SOUTH CHINA SEA.

Past campaign speeches and interviews of presidential-elect Rodrigo Duterte in relation to the pending UNCLOS arbitration case filed by the Philippines against China are unclear, vague, evasive, and inconsistent, showing (a) his ignorance of the provisions of UNCLOS and the legal theory alleged in the pending UNCLOS arbitral petition of the Philippines; (b) his desire not to antagonize China during the campaign period for mysterious reasons known only to himself; and (c) his manipulative political tactic to secure the votes of all sectors of Philippines society.

In the pending UCNLOS arbitral case of the Philippines, we assert our rights to a 200-nautical mile EEZ and CS and other maritime entitlements due to our country within the West Philippine Sea as expressly provided by UNCLOS.

The 9-Dash Line Ownership Theory of China claims almost the whole of the South China Sea.

It covers the EEZ and CS of the Philippines.

China’s claim is not recognized by the whole world. There is no past or present international judgment that affirms China’s 9-Dash Ownership Theory, whether expressly or impliedly.

Meanwhile, China militarizes the contested maritime area by building new islands and military bases, ports and airports in the contested area and installing military equipment, weapons and personnel therein.

The United States, Japan, Australia, India and other US allies assert the FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION of the whole world in the South China Sea by sending regular freedom-of-navigation naval and air assets in the area.

They do not recognize China’s Air Defense Identification Zone in the area.

More than five-trillion-dollars-worth of world goods travels yearly through the South China Sea.

The Philippines and the USA are bound to defend each other by virtue of a post-World War II Mutual Defense Treaty.

During the visit last year of US Pres. Barak Obama to the Philippines, he expressly affirmed that the military defense alliance between the Philippines and USA was iron-clad.

Duterte made the following statements during his campaign:

1.      He will “cooperate” and “be friendly” with China.

2.    He might withdraw the Philippine UNCLOS arbitral case against China in exchange for Chinese investments, e.g., railways for Mindanao and Bicol.

3.    Like Vice President Jojo Binay, Duterte might explore “joint ventures/partnerships” with China (which do international business through its state corporations) to “jointly develop and exploit” the rich marine resources and minerals “within the West Philippines Sea (within the 200-nautical mile Philippine EEZ and CS).”

During the campaign, news reports revealed that Duterte secretly met with Chinese diplomats in Cebu City.

He did not volunteer any information to the mass media about the topics and agreements discuss and reached during the secret meetings.

In many public interviews Duterte declared that, if elected, he would be the “first leftist or socialist president of the Philippines.”

A modern leftist or socialist or communist follows the “Marx-Lenin-Mao Tse Tung Thought.”

He promised to coalesce and share political power with the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP)-New People’s Army (NPA)-National Democratic Front (NDF) by appointing their leaders to major slots in his Cabinet, e.g., Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), and Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), and others.

As earlier stated, Article XII (National Economy and Patrimony) of the 1987 of the Constitution provides:

(1)             that the exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the “full control and supervision of the State”;  

(2)            that the State may directly undertake such activities, or it may enter into “co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens”;  

(3)            that such agreements may be for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law;

(4)            that the State shall protect the nation's marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone, and “reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens”;

(5)                 that the President may enter into agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving either “technical or financial assistance” for large-scale exploration, development, and utilization of minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils “according to the general terms and conditions provided by law, based on real contributions to the economic growth and general welfare of the country”; and

(6)            that the President shall “notify the Congress” of every contract entered into in accordance with this provision, within thirty days from its execution.

Further Article XII provides:

(1)                  that no franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines “at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens”, nor shall such franchise, certificate, or authorization be exclusive in character or for a longer period than fifty years;

(2)            that neither shall any such franchise or right be granted except under the condition that it shall be “subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires”;

(3)            that the State shall encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public; and

(4)            that the participation of foreign investors in the governing body of any public utility enterprise shall be limited to their proportionate share in its capital, and all the executive and managing officers of such corporation or association must be citizens of the Philippines.

Article XII further provides that acts which circumvent or negate any of the provisions thereof shall be considered “inimical to the national interest and subject to criminal and civil sanctions, as may be provided by law.”

A violation by Duterte of the foregoing constitutional provisions, simply to please China, would constitute impeachable offenses.

As earlier stated, Article XI of the 1987 Constitution provides that public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency, act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives.

The same Article XI provides that the President, Vice-President, the Members of the Supreme Court, the Members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the Ombudsman may be removed from office, on IMPEACHMENT for, and conviction of, “culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.”

During the campaign, Duterte bragged that if Congress attempts to impeach him, he will declare a REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNEMNT and abolish Congress.

Duterte’s anti-Constitutionalism braggadocio exposes his real character.

If Duterte persists with his unconstitutional plans, he would face any or all of the following painful scenarios:

(1)                  Coup d’etat;
(2)            Civil War;
(3)            Edsa Revolution;
(4)            Assassination.

In any of the abovementioned scenarios, the Filipino people would be the first victims because the end results thereof would be capital flight, recession, skyrocketing interest rates, shortage of food, water, medicine, energy, and other basic necessities, increased poverty and criminality, and the like.