Friday, February 24, 2017

Robredo’s most stinging message to Duterte so far as the nation celebrates EDSA 1986



“Some leaders would like us to forget the atrocities of martial law…Some leaders are too happy to glorify the dictatorship of Marcos, to revise the history so that he is remembered a hero, and not the thief and murderer that he was…Some leaders want to raise the fist of authoritarianism, to sow fear and discord among ourselves, to divide us with lies, violence, and bloodshed…It has begun….So on Friday the nation woke up to a worrying scene: A senator and a staunch critic of the President was escorted into police custody…The message was loud and clear: Anyone who dares speak dissent is not safe….Mr. President, we call you to task. In behalf of the Filipino people, whose daily struggles are escalating, we ask you to focus on the war that really matters – the war on poverty. Our people are hungry, jobless and poor. Be the leader you promised to be, and stop the lies that are distorting the truth in our society today…Use your leadership to point the nation towards respect for rule of law, instead of disregard for it; to uphold the basic human rights enshrined in the institution, instead of encouraging its abuse.”

Note:
This is, so far, the sharpest and most stinging message that Robredo has issued in condemnation of Duterte.

Read more: 
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/875100/robredo-to-duterte-stop-the-lies-that-are-distorting-the-truth#ixzz4Zc6nfeva

FULL TEXT: Archbishop Villegas' open letter to Cardinal Sin on EDSA




"x x x.

(Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Socrates "Soc" Villegas, president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines, wrote the following open letter to his mentor, the late Manila Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin, for the 31st anniversary of the EDSA People Power Revolution of February 25, 1986. Villegas was the long-time private secretary of Sin.)

Dear Cardinal Sin,

It is you I miss most these days.

I do not mean to disturb your peace. You already have passed from this valley of tears to the House of the Father, but please Cardinal Sin, do not forget us in our present travails as a nation. I know you can receive this message. I believe. Nothing can separate you from us in the Lord. You love this country so much. You will not let us lose our hope. 


I know you can hear me, and I know you are here. As I know your love for this country, I also believe that in heaven your heart pleads to the heart of God to embrace this beautiful land. Cardinal Sin, embrace us and ask God to embrace your God loving people. Do not look at the blessings we have squandered and the heroism we have ridiculed. Do not look at the news we have faked and the people we have cheated. Do not look at our uncaring attitude about the victims of extrajudicial killings now exceeding the number of victims during martial law. 


Look at us in our fears and pray for us to God to heal our land. Give us courage. Give us hope. Shake us up from our timidity.

Thirty one years after EDSA 1986, I hear our people ask: What shall we celebrate? What is there to celebrate? By the corner of EDSA and Ortigas, I want to sit and weep as I remember the four glorious days of February 1986 now dimmed. The glory now flickers in the darkness of fear and terror again. The songs of peace now drowned by the cuss words of hate that invite murder. The bloodless revolt now stained by the blood in our streets and street gutters. The statistics of unresolved murder continues to rise, and not a single one has been investigated and brought to justice.

Four days of bloodless revolution! Wow!

Now 8 months of relentless killings of the poor in the name of "change"! It is a nightmare, Your Eminence! It is a shame.

'Did you also cry quietly?'

The dictator ousted by People Power is now buried among heroes. The Lady of 1,200 pairs of shoes is now Representative in Congress. History books are rewritten. Historical memory is revised. The hero is a villain. The plunderers are now heroes. Thank God, Eminence, you did not see these days we are going through.

Tears flow. Uncertainties choke us. It is hard to choose silence and take the blows. How long can we endure? It is hard to fight for the right without question or pause and be willing to march into hell for a heavenly cause. You remember that song Eminence? That was your favorite line I remember. Singing it again makes me smile and makes me tear.

Did you also cry quietly in the dark years of the dictatorship? Were you ever discouraged and did you also question yourself if what you were doing was right? Were you ever afraid or did you ever feel the urge to stay in your zone of comfort instead of fighting the unbeatable foe?

Cardinal Sin, I feel the same and you know that. I know many feel this way. Teach us how to cope. Teach us your courage. Teach us your humor. Teach us your faith. Teach us righteous indignation. Wake us up from our pacifism and pull us into the fire of passion and courage again.

x x x."

Thursday, February 23, 2017

To the Integrated Bar of the Philippines: Filipino lawyers who keep silent in the face of oppression, tyranny and injustice due to ignorance, indifference, fear, or greed, are unworthy of their professional licenses to practise law and to dispense justice.



Many ask why the IBP has been silent and inactive in the face of the seven thousand victims of summary executions/extrajudicial murders that Duterte's deadly war on drugs has inflicted in the past seven months (a gruesome death toll of one thousand per month).

So far, the IBP's only feat has been to issue a routine statement (2016) asking the PNP (the main suspect) to investigate the killings. That's all.

It must be noted that the IBP is receiving millions of pesos annually from the Supreme Court to fund its national and local free legal aid committees and their pro bono lawyers.

As a lifetime member and a former director, secretary and vice president of the IBP Pasay Paranaque Las Pinas Muntinlupa Chapter (1993-2005) and as the founder and past chair/president of the Las Pinas City Bar Association (2001), I exhort the IBP national board to speak up, move, organize and fund its pro bono human rights lawyers nationwide to handle the litigation of the cases in behalf of the victims of the war on drugs and their hapless families.

Filipino lawyers who keep silent in the face of oppression, tyranny and injustice due to ignorance, indifference, fear, or greed, are unworthy of their professional licenses to practise law and to dispense justice.

By their silence, they have abandoned their oaths of office as advocates of truth, freedom, and justice and have disowned the legal profession, a major pillar of the justice system, and their sacred role as officers of the courts.

Below are excerpts from a news item on De Lima's exhortation to the IBP national leaders to mobilize and move as one national voice of Filipino lawyers.

"SENATOR Leila de Lima has appealed to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) and the public to “voice out their outrage” against extrajudicial killings (EJKs), but she maintained that she is not calling for a “people power” revolt against the Duterte administration.

"De Lima made the remark as she deplored the unabated EJK of suspected drug dealers and drug users despite the pronouncement of Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Director General Ronald dela Rosa that he had temporarily stopped the implementation of “Oplan Tokhang” or the government’s all-out war against illegal drugs.

"x x x.

"Asked to qualify her call to the IBP, De Lima said: “To IBP and the lawyers, kasi napapansin ko po, mukhang malabnaw palagi ang mga nagiging reaction nila. They should be more proactive. Tulungan po nila ‘yung mga pamilya ng biktima ng EJKs.”

“Huwag ho nilang ipaubaya lang sa mga groups like FLAG (Free Legal Assistance Group). We are fortunate enough na may grupo katulad ng FLAG na umaasikaso ng mga usapin na ‘yan, sa mga kaso na ‘yan ng EJKs,” she said."

“But I’m appealing to the professional organizations, to the lawyers, to the IBP: lend a hand in terms of exacting justice and accountability,” said De Lima."

SENATOR Leila de Lima has appealed to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) and the public to “voice out their outrage” against extrajudicial ki...
JOURNAL.COM.PH

"Criminal illegal immigrants/aliens" is a vague and generic term that ICE can loosely interpret with grave abuse of indiscretion.




"Criminal illegal immigrants/aliens" is a vague and generic term that ICE can loosely interpret with grave abuse of indiscretion to include any and all aliens in the USA who have violated US immigration, criminal, civil, administrative, and other state and federal laws, minor or serious in nature. 

This bothers many "non-criminal undocumented and illegal aliens" who are working in the US. Some of them, according to pro bono human rights lawyers, were illegally deprived of their constitutional and human right to counsel upon arrest and detention by ICE agents. 

The term "non-criminal undocumented illegal aliens" may include any and all of the following kinds of aliens:

* Those who entered US "without visas" (undocumented) through a US border, 
* Those staying in the US with "expired visas", 
* Those who have "violated the terms and conditions of their validly issued visas", 
* Those who have failed to comply with the "strict, tedious and costly immigration procedures" to acquire "asylum, refugee and other special kinds of visas", 
* Those who have violated the terms and conditions of their "naturalization", 
* And the like. 

Do not kid yourselves that ICE is arresting only "criminal" undocumented/illegal aliens (which the American public is misled to believe as to include only "felons convicted by final judgments for serious and heinous felonies"). 

The panic is spreading throughout the USA. In due time, Americans will realize the injurious economic, political and foreign policy damage that such an "ethnocentric immigration policy" has caused and will continue to inflict on America itself as a world superpower. 

Like Duterte, the "isolationist, protectionist, and ultra-nationalist policy" of Trump will work against the national interest of America as a world leader. 

It seems to me that America is unnecessarily wasting its precious international political capital as the role model of freedom, democracy, compassion, humanitarianism, and Christian values in the world. 

Notes:

I have read reports that during the terms of Clinton, Bush and Obama, at least one million [or even more] "criminal and non-criminal undocumented/illegal aliens" were deported. 

The deportation program is not an original Trump invention, although his Duterte-type rhetoric and zeal creates the impression that the protectionist US immigration policy is his cruel creation. 

In the case of Obama he extended a compassionate reprieve from deportation via an executive order to all illegal aliens in the US who had migrated thereto while still innocent minors and who had been reared and educated therein until adulthood (called the "Dreamers") such that they have become true Americans by inculturation but not by legal documentation. 

It seems that Trump has de facto set aside the aforecited compassionate Obama executive order. 

Further, the grave emotional issue of "family disintegration" caused by a cruel and inhumane immigration policy continues to haunt the Bible-reading people of America whose God has taught them to unconditionally love and help all strangers, regardless of creed, race, gender, economic status, education, and worldviews. 


Amnesty report slams Trump, Duterte, and other leaders

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

HRW: "...the Duterte administration's drug crackdown is a danger to not only those targeted, but also the criminal justice and political systems."





"x x x.

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [official website] on Saturday issued a call to Philippine authorities [HRW report] to drop political charges against Senator Leila de Lima, who has spoken against President Rodrigo Duterte's war on drugs. The charges brought against de Lima, as well as her driver and several unnamed individuals, are for violation of section 5 of the Dangerous Drugs Act, which prohibits the "sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and transportation of illegal drugs." If de Lima were found guilty on the current charges, which HRW called "an act of political vindictiveness," she would face 12 years to life in prison. Kine was emphatic that these charges show the Duterte administration's drug crackdown is a danger to not only those targeted, but also the criminal justice and political systems. De Lima said domestic and foreign lawmakers would need to stand up and "denounce the Duterte administration's disregard for basic human rights." De Lima is alleged to have accepted money from drug lords and facilitated drug-trading operations while she was the justice secretary under the former president. De Lima has been the most outspoken critic of Duterte's war on drugs, particularly over the 7000 extrajudicial killings resulting from the recent crackdown. In August, de Lima headed hearings in the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, investigating these killings under Duterte's regime. Her actions have since incited various attacks on her character from the Duterte administration and pro-Duterte senators.

During Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's campaign last year, he had stated 100,000 people would die [Guardian report] in his crackdown on crime. In December the UN rights chief urged [JURIST report] a murder investigation into Duterte after Duterte stated that he had killed three suspected criminals while he was mayor. In October the International Criminal Court [official website] expressed concern [JURIST report] over the rising occurrence of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines in connection with the ongoing war on drugs. In September Duterte declared a "state of lawlessness" [JURIST report] in the Philippines, which would allow police and military personnel to frisk individuals and search cars. In August Duterte named [JURIST report] 150 serving and former state officials connected to the nation's illegal drug trade and ordered them to either surrender to the authorities or risk being hunted down. Duterte has stated that he disregards criticisms from the UN and human rights groups. Also in August Duterte threatened to withdraw [JURIST report] the country from the UN following criticisms against his controversial crackdown on illegal drugs.

x x x."

"Tyranny of the majority" in Congress to railroad Duterte's favorite death penalty bill.





"x x x.

Opposition lawmakers in the House of Representatives on Tuesday scored the leadership’s plan to railroad the death penalty bill by bypassing the plenary debate and putting the bill to a vote next week.

In a press conference at the House of Representatives, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said a “train terminal has been installed menacingly in the plenary hall of the House of Representatives” due to the planned railroad of House Bill 4727 seeking to restore the death penalty on Feb. 28.

Lagman said the leadership led by Majority Leader Rodolfo “Rudy” Fariñas wanted to railroad the bill following opposition from lawmakers who constantly questioned the quorum during sessions in a bid to block the prompt passage of the bill.

“The advance voting was a reaction to the quorum calls of those objecting to the retrogressive measure,” Lagman said.

Lagman said the Lower House could not act on passing the death penalty bill on Feb. 28 if there is no quorum in the plenary.


“It is a puzzle why the House leadership gets peeved when the absence of a quorum is raised considering that under the Rules no business can be conducted in the absence of a quorum,” Lagman said.

Lagman said moving to adjourn the session due to absence of a quorum is permitted in the Rules of the House, under Article 75 of Rule XI as a legitimate parliamentary motion.

“It is the duty of the House leadership to maintain a quorum after the roll call is held in order to assure that the interpellations and debates would continue,” Lagman said.

Asked why the House leadership is rushing the passage of such a controversial measure just less than a month after it reached the plenary for debates, Lagman said the leadership is railroading the bill because it is not confident with its numbers to pass it.

“If they are acting this way, they don’t have the numbers,” Lagman said.

Lagman scored the leadership for rushing the bill while muzzling the opposition by putting a deadline for the plenary debates.

“They appear omnipotent. When we use the rules legitimately parang sila napipikon (it’s like they are the ones peeved). I cannot understand why we should rush the voting on this very important although retrogressive measure,” Lagman said.

Lagman said this is the first time in Congress’ history to stifle the brewing opposition on any legislation in the House of Representatives.

“This kind of muzzling has not happened before. This is a way of continuing the culture of violence because suppressing freedom of expression is a form of violence,” Lagman said.


For his part, Akbayan Rep. Tom Villarin said the leadership is railroading the bill fearful that it would not be passed once President Rodrigo Duterte’s political capital erodes.

Duterte faces anew the issue of his involvement in death squads when he was Davao city mayor as divulged by his former right-hand man SPO3 Arturo Lascañas, who claimed Duterte ordered the death squad to kill criminals and his vocal critics, including broadcaster Jun Pala.


“Baka by the second year of the Duterte presidency, pabagsak yung political capital (Maybe by the second year of the Duterte presidency, his political capital would go down). That is the only pragmatic and political reason on why they want to rush this bill. Right to life cuts across sectors,” Villarin said.

On Monday, Fariñas said that the House majority agreed to limit the offenses punishable with death to drug-related offenses, plunder and treason.

He said that mere possession of illegal drugs has been removed from the drug-related offenses in the bill.

Accoding to the original version of the bill, the following are punishable with death under the Revised Penal Code—treason, qualified piracy, qualified bribery, parricide, murder, infanticide, rape, kidnapping and serious illegal detention, robbery with homicide, rape, intentional mutilation or arson and destructive arson.


The following offenses under the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act are also punishable with death—importation; sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and transportation; maintenance of a den, dive or resort; manufacture; possession of certain quantities of dangerous drugs; cultivation; unlawful prescription; misappropriation or failure to account confiscated, seized or surrendered dangerous drugs; and planting of evidence.

Carnapping is also a criminal offense punishable with death under the Anti-Carnapping Act or Republic Act 6539.

Plunder is also punishable with reclusion perpetua to death according to Republic Act 7080 or the plunder law as amended by Republic Act 7659.

Lawmakers initially wanted to remove plunder from death row, which garnered public backlash compelling Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez to call for plunder as punishable with the death penalty.


Meanwhile, the death penalty bill in the Senate hit a gridlock after senators centered on the country’s obligations to the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which under the Second Optional Protocol states that “Each State Party shall take all necessary measures to abolish the death penalty within its jurisdiction.” RAM/rga


x x x."

Trillanes calls Duterte's bluff, asks AMLC for list of Duterte's bank transactions (unexplained wealth in the BPI, et. al.) | Inquirer News





"x x x.

Trillanes asks AMLC for list of Duterte’s bank transactions
By: Maila Ager - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
INQUIRER.net / 03:10 PM February 21, 2017



Senator Antonio “Sonny” Trillanes IV’s letter requesting the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) for a list of all “flagged/reported bank transactions” of President Rodrigo Duterte from 2006 onwards. MAILA AGER/INQUIRER.net

Senator Antonio “Sonny” Trillanes IV on Tuesday wrote the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC), requesting for a list of all “flagged/reported bank transactions” of President Rodrigo Duterte from 2006 onwards.

The request was contained in the senator’s one-page letter to the AMLC.

“In view of the statements of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte publicly announcing that he has directed the Anti-Money Laundering Council to open to the public his bank transactions, I am hereby requesting for a list of all flagged/reported bank transactions under his name starting from 2006 and onwards, during which time he was serving as public official,” Trillanes said in the letter.

“I trust that the public statement and very categorical claim of the President himself for you to release his bank transactions, as publicized in all major radio and TV networks and newspapers on 17 and 18 of January 2017, would be sufficient for this purpose,” he said.

Trillanes, in a separate statement, reiterated his belief that Duterte’s order to the AMLC to release his bank transactions was just a “political bluff.”

“I believe that President Duterte’s public announcement to release his bank transactions is just a political bluff because simply writing a waiver addressed to the bank would have been much simpler. Nonetheless, I am calling his bluff and I have written to AMLC to publicly release said information,” he said.


If the AMLC could not release the President’s bank transactions, then the senator said this would be another proof that “he is again fooling the Filipino people.”

Last week, Trillanes revived his allegation that the President had P2.2 billion bank deposits from 2006 to 2015. He first exposed Duterte’s alleged hidden wealth during the campaign period last year. CDG/rga


RELATED VIDEO

Duterte to Trillanes: Prove my P2-B bank deposit and I’ll resign
News

x x x."

List of laws (by chronology) re: Sandiganbayan jurisdiction and related matters.



* The Philippine Constitution of 1973 (Sec. 5, Article VIII) created a special court, known as Sandiganbayan, with jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt practices and such other offenses committed by public officers and employees, including those in governmentowned or controlled corporations, in relation to their office as may be determined by law.

• Presidential Decree No. 1486 (June 11, 1978) supported the creation of the Sandiganbayan as provided for under the 1973 Constitution.

• Presidential Decree No. 1606 (January 10, 1979), revised PD 1486, elevating the Sandiganbayan to the same level as the Court of Appeals.

• Presidential Decree No. 1861 (March 23, 1983) amended pertinent provisions of PD 1606 and Batas Pambansa Blg. 129 relative to the exclusive original jurisdiction of the andiganbayan over cases involving violations of RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act) and other offenses or felonies committed by public officers and employees in relation to their office.

• Executive Order No. 14 (May 7, 1986), as amended by EO 14-A (August 18, 1986), defined the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan over cases filed by the Philippine Commission on Good Government (PCGG) involving the ill-gotten wealth of the Marcos family and relatives.

• The Philippine Constitution of 1987 (Sec. 4, Article XI) provided for the anti-graft court known as the Sandiganbayan to continue to function and exercise its jurisdiction over graft and corruption practices provided by law.

• Republic Act 7975 (March 30, 1995) strengthened the functional and structural organization of the Sandiganbayan.

• Republic Act 8249 (February 5, 1997) further defined the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, amending for the purpose PD 1606.

* The latest - REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10660 - AN ACT STRENGTHENING FURTHER THE FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN, FURTHER AMENDING PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1606, AS AMENDED, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR.

"The court affirmed the resolutions of the Office of the Ombudsman approving the filing of criminal charges against Napoles and two others in connection with the alleged misuse of over P25-million PDAF funds of former Agusan del Sur Rep. Rodolfo Plaza."





"x x x.

MANILA, Philippines - Pork barrel queen Janet Lim-Napoles is not about to be released from prison despite the recent move by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) to reverse her conviction in serious illegal detention case.

This came after the Supreme Court upheld her indictment in the Sandiganbayan over the multibillion-peso Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) scam yesterday.

The court affirmed the resolutions of the Office of the Ombudsman approving the filing of criminal charges against Napoles and two others in connection with the alleged misuse of over P25-million PDAF funds of former Agusan del Sur Rep. Rodolfo Plaza.

Aside from Napoles, it also dismissed the separate petitions of her driver John Raymund de Asis and former National Agri-Business Corp. president Alan Javellana to dismiss the malversation of public funds, corruption of public officials and violation of the Anti-Graft Law cases filed against them.

The SC agreed with the ombudsman’s finding of probable cause, citing lack of proof that the anti-graft office has abused its discretion in filing the case at the Sandiganbayan.

“Petitioners’ contentions that the absence of the elements of the crimes they were charged with is a matter of defense to be ventilated at the trial as these are evidentiary matters requiring a full-blown (trial) and not during preliminary investigation,” the high court ruled.

Napoles is standing trial in several plunder cases in the anti-graft court also in relation to the PDAF scam.

The SC ruling came after the OSG sought the acquittal of Napoles before the Court of Appeals in the case involving serious illegal detention of star witness Benhur Luy, for which she was convicted.

Last week, Solicitor General Jose Calida defended his move to recommend Napoles’ acquittal, saying that his office just wanted to let the court know its opinion on the matter.

He said the Makati regional trial court (RTC) wrongly convicted Napoles.

“In Napoles’ case, it is my well-considered opinion and that of my assistants that the RTC erred in convicting Napoles. When we look at evidence, there are glaring instances that will support acquittal of the accused. It is my duty to state the facts. Persons involved here are immaterial to us. What’s important is justice should be done,” Calida said at a televised press briefing.

He claimed Luy was not illegally detained, pointing out that the latter did not exhibit restrained behavior, saw his family three times and was able to communicate with anyone outside.

x x x."

"The writ for amparo is a relief granted by the court to families and relatives of victims of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. Courts grant the said relief through judicial orders of protection, production, and inspection to safeguard people’s life and liberty."





"x x x.

The online news portal of TV5

MANILA, Philippines – A protection order – the second this year – has been issued by the Supreme Court to the family of another alleged victim of the Duterte administration’s war on drugs campaign or “Oplan Tokhang.”

In an en banc session on Tuesday, the high tribunal acted on the writ of amparo petition filed by Christina Macandog, the widow of alleged Tokhang victim Joselito Gonzales, who died of multiple gunshot wounds on July 5, 2016 during a reported encounter with policemen.

The writ for amparo is a relief granted by the court to families and relatives of victims of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. Courts grant the said relief through judicial orders of protection, production, and inspection to safeguard people’s life and liberty.

The high court also barred the respondents from entering within a radius of one kilometer from the petitioner’s residence and place of work.

The high tribunal issued the temporary protection order against the following respondents:

Department of Interior and Local Government Secretary Ismael Sueño, Philippine National Police Director-General Ronald Dela Rosa
Chief Superintendent Valfrie Tabian
Senior Superintendent Adriano Enong
Superintendent Simnar Semacio Gran
Inspector Dogwe
Allen Cadag
Mark Riel Canilon
Several John Does from the Antipolo City Police Station Anti-Illegal Drugs Special Operations Task Force and the Rizal police’s Provincial Special Operating Unit Team

In her petition, Macandog claimed that she and her husband “were induced by respondent police officers to deal in drugs but that they decided, in mid-2016, to surrender and reform but that, before they could do the same, Cadag and Canilon threatened to kill them.”

Macandog said threat had resulted in Gonzales' slay. Fearing that she would be killed next, Macandog has gone into hiding, leaving her child behind. 

In the same order, the high court ordered the Court of Appeals to immediately raffle off the case and decide on it 10 days after the case is declared submitted for decision.

Meanwhile, the high tribunal gave five working days to the respondents to make a verified return.

Last month, the high court also issued a temporary protection order barring the police from entering the homes and workplaces of the families of four garbage collectors who were killed last year in Barangay Payatas, Quezon City during an anti-illegal drug operation.

The writ of amparo was issued for Efren Murillo, who survived the said operation conducted in August 2016, and the relatives of garbage collectors Marcello Daa, Jessie Cule, Raffy Gabo, and Anthony Comendo.

x x x."

Monday, February 20, 2017

I-Witness: "Dorm 12", dokumentaryo ni Kara David (full episode)

I-Witness: ‘Balik Bitay?’ dokumentaryo ni Howie Severino (full episode)

I-Witness: ‘Tiis Piitan,’ dokumentaryo ni Jay Taruc (full episode)

TRUMP: U.S. may deport more than 300,000 Filipinos

Reporters: The Philippines’ ruthless war on drugs

Manila prisons full during President's war on drugs

Philippines Prisons: Duterte's drug war sends thousands to prison

Inside The Most Dangerous Prisons Philippines

Child Prisoners in the Philippines (international documentary)